Abstract 4361602: SGLT2 Inhibitors in LVAD Patients: A Multi-Center Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis

Y Yaman Jarrar (Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States) A Ahmad Alkhatib (MedStar Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States) M Mustafa Al shaikhli (Rutgers-Jersey City Medical Center, Jersey City, New Jersey, United States) E Emmanuel Otabor (Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) L Laith Alomari (Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) D Daoud Eldawud (SUNY Downstate University, Brooklyn, New York, United States)

Abstract

Background: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are guideline-directed therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), yet their utility in patients supported with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) remains understudied. This study examined the association between SGLT2i use and clinical outcomes in LVAD recipients over a standardized 1-year follow-up. Methods: We queried the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network to identify adult patients with an LVAD (ICD-10 Z95.811 and procedure codes for insertion/revision). Patients were stratified based on exposure to SGLT2 inhibitors (canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, ertugliflozin) post-implant. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included hospitalizations, acute kidney injury (AKI), bloodstream infections (MSSA/MRSA), and device-related complications. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed on demographics, comorbidities, and background medical therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare time-to-event outcomes. Results: After matching, 711 patients were included in each cohort. At 1 year, mortality was significantly lower in the SGLT2i group (8.0% vs. 24.2%; HR: 0.28 [95% CI: 0.21–0.38]; p <0.001). SGLT2i use was also associated with reduced hospitalization (62.3% vs. 70.7%; HR: 0.59; p <0.001), AKI (43.6% vs. 58.2%; HR: 0.56; p <0.001), and bloodstream infections (10.7% vs. 15.7%; HR: 0.59; p =0.002). The SGLT2i group had a higher rate of device-related infection (26.7% vs. 20.3%; HR: 1.20; p =0.099), but this did not reach statistical significance in survival analysis. Conclusion: In this large real-world analysis, SGLT2 inhibitor use in LVAD patients was associated with markedly reduced 1-year mortality and improved cardiorenal and infectious outcomes. These findings suggest a potential role for SGLT2i in optimizing medical therapy in LVAD recipients, a population not included in pivotal HF trials. This retrospective analysis may be affected by residual confounding despite rigorous matching. Medication timing, dose, and adherence were not available, and cause-specific mortality could not be assessed. While a 1-year follow-up standardized time at risk, long-term effects remain unknown. Prospective validation is needed.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (6)

Y

Yaman Jarrar

Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

A

Ahmad Alkhatib

MedStar Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

M

Mustafa Al shaikhli

Rutgers-Jersey City Medical Center, Jersey City, New Jersey, United States

E

Emmanuel Otabor

Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

L

Laith Alomari

Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

D

Daoud Eldawud

SUNY Downstate University, Brooklyn, New York, United States