Abstract 4360705: Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

A Ahmed Kamal Siddiqi (Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States) M Muhammad Talha Maniya (Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan) K Kumail Mustafa Ali (Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan) N Nicholas Chew (Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore) J Jamal Rana (KAISER PERMANENTE, Oakland, California, United States) A Anandita Agarwala (Baylor Scott and White Health, Plano, Texas, United States) M Mohammad Khan (Baylor Scott and White Health, Plano, Texas, United States)

Abstract

Background: Hypertension (HTN), a prevalent comorbidity in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), increases the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events, mortality, and kidney complications. However, optimal blood pressure (BP) targets in patients with T2DM remain unclear. Research Question: Does intensive BP control, compared to standard targets, reduce CV, renal, and mortality outcomes in patients with T2DM? Aims: We aim to conduct an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of intensive vs. standard BP control on CV and kidney outcomes and mortality in T2DM patients. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus was conducted through December 2024 for trials comparing intensive vs. standard BP control in patients with T2DM. Outcomes assessed included all-cause mortality, CV mortality, major adverse CV events (MACE), stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), incident heart failure (HF), chronic kidney disease (CKD) development, albuminuria, and serious adverse events (SAEs). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. Results: 28 trials encompassing 104,634 patients were included. Intensive BP control significantly reduced the risk of CV mortality (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.65–0.87, P = 0.0001), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76–0.95, P = 0.004), MACE (RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.75–0.87, P < 0.00001), stroke (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.61–0.80, P < 0.00001), MI (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.79–0.94, P = 0.001), HF (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64–0.96, P = 0.02), and albuminuria (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82–0.97, P = 0.005). There were no significant differences in CKD development (RR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.92–1.26, P = 0.36) or SAEs (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.97–1.40, P = 0.10). Conclusions: Intensive BP control in patients with T2DM was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, CV mortality, MACE, stroke, MI, HF, and albuminuria as compared to standard control, without an increased risk of serious adverse events.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (7)

A

Ahmed Kamal Siddiqi

Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States

M

Muhammad Talha Maniya

Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan

K

Kumail Mustafa Ali

Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan

N

Nicholas Chew

Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

J

Jamal Rana

KAISER PERMANENTE, Oakland, California, United States

A

Anandita Agarwala

Baylor Scott and White Health, Plano, Texas, United States

M

Mohammad Khan

Baylor Scott and White Health, Plano, Texas, United States