Abstract 4360339: When Drainage Backfires: Pericardial Decompression Syndrome in an ESRD Patient

K Khaled Abdel Aziz (University of Cincinatti, Cincinatti, Ohio, United States) C Charlene Kotei (University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States) A Ahmad Tejan Sie (University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States) H Hamza Sultan (UCMC MEDICAL CENTER, Dayton, Kentucky, United States) D Damian Slifer (Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States) L Leonid Khokhlov (University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States) N Naseer Khan (University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States)

Abstract

Introduction: End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients may develop pericardial effusion due to fluid overload from inadequate dialysis. Large effusions, when drained, can cause pericardial decompression syndrome, a rare complication involving paradoxical hemodynamic collapse. This case highlights the challenges with management of a large pericardial effusion in an ESRD patient. Case Description: A 44 year old male with ESRD on intermittent hemodialysis (iHD) presented with chest pain and systolic blood pressure in the 80s. Exam showed jugular venous distension. Transthoracic echocardiogram revealed a large pericardial effusion without tamponade (Figure A). Pericardiocentesis drained 2.5 liters of sanguineous fluid (Figure B). Post procedure, the patient's mean arterial pressure decreased beneath 65 mmHg. Bedside echocardiogram was concerning for right ventricular dilation. The drain was temporarily clamped, and the patient received vasopressors. He underwent continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for fluid optimization before returning to iHD with improved ultrafiltration goals. By day seven, the drain produced less than 50 mL of fluid over the previous twenty-four hours. Bedside echocardiogram was confirmatory, so the drain was removed. The patient was discharged with outpatient cardiology follow-up. Discussion: Despite the large effusion, the absence of tamponade suggests chronic fluid accumulation, allowing gradual pericardial stretch, reduced intra-pericardial pressure change, and hemodynamic compensation. In this patient, pericardial decompression syndrome occurred from suddenly increased venous return, rapid right sided expansion (as shown on bedside echocardiogram), septal shift, left ventricular compression, decreased output, and ultimately hypotension. Another factor may have been the sudden change in preload with relatively unchanged systemic vascular resistance, thus preload/afterload mismatch. The effusion was likely due to insufficient fluid removal during dialysis, emphasizing the importance of dialysis quality in preventing cardiac complications. However, decompression syndrome is rare, with less than 5% incidence among patients who undergo drainage. Conclusion: Inadequate dialysis predisposes to fluid overload, which can cause large pericardial effusion. While tamponade may be absent, large effusions propose the risk of decompression syndrome with drainage. Optimal dialysis and close hemodynamic monitoring were critical in this patient's recovery.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (7)

K

Khaled Abdel Aziz

University of Cincinatti, Cincinatti, Ohio, United States

C

Charlene Kotei

University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

A

Ahmad Tejan Sie

University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

H

Hamza Sultan

UCMC MEDICAL CENTER, Dayton, Kentucky, United States

D

Damian Slifer

Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

L

Leonid Khokhlov

University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

N

Naseer Khan

University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States