Abstract 4359607: Short-Term Gains, Long-Term Costs: Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction
Abstract
Background: Despite its growing use as a less invasive alternative to SAVR in severe aortic stenosis, outcomes of TAVR in HFrEF patients remain under-investigated. Methods: Using TriNetX, we retrospectively compared 1-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month outcomes after first-time TAVR versus SAVR in propensity-score-matched adults (≥18 years) with nonrheumatic aortic stenosis and HFrEF (Jan 2012–Dec 2022), excluding those with congenital valve malformations, prior prostheses, aortic insufficiency, stage 4-5 CKD or dialysis, preserved EF, or cross-exposure (i.e., receipt of both TAVR and SAVR). Results: Among 417 propensity-matched patients (mean age 70 y; 74 % male), at 1 month, TAVR was associated with lower risks of all-atrial fibrillation (RR 0.54; p < 0.001), paroxysmal AF (RR 0.68; p = 0.023), acute kidney injury (RR 0.46; p < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (RR 0.27; p < 0.001), major bleeding (RR 0.33; p < 0.001) and hospitalization (RR 0.77; p = 0.041), but a higher risk of pacemaker/ICD implantation (RR 1.72; p = 0.009); SAVR alone had more aortic dissections (10 vs 0; p = 0.001). At 6 months, TAVR showed increased risks of ventricular tachycardia (RR 2.07; p = 0.02), acute coronary syndrome (RR 1.70; p = 0.02), left bundle branch block (RR 1.97; p < 0.001), debility (RR 1.96; p = 0.012) and pacemaker/ICD implantation (RR 1.63; p = 0.007), alongside reduced risks of all-atrial fibrillation (RR 0.64; p < 0.001), paroxysmal AF (RR 0.72; p = 0.03), acute kidney injury (RR 0.58; p = 0.002), cardiogenic shock (RR 0.38; p = 0.002) and bleeding (RR 0.38; p < 0.001). At 12 months, ventricular tachycardia remained higher (RR 2.65; p < 0.001) and bleeding remained lower (RR 0.44; p < 0.001). At 2 years, TAVR was associated with higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 1.51; p = 0.001), ventricular tachycardia (RR 1.93; p = 0.003), acute coronary syndrome (RR 1.68; p = 0.003), and all-cause mortality (RR 1.91; p = 0.001), but lower rates of all-atrial fibrillation (RR 0.76; p < 0.001), bleeding (RR 0.63; p = 0.001) and cardiogenic shock (RR 0.42; p = 0.001). Conclusion: In patients with HFrEF, TAVR was associated with favorable early safety outcomes, including lower rates of atrial fibrillation, bleeding, acute kidney injury, and cardiogenic shock. However, by 2 years, higher risks of ventricular arrhythmias, acute coronary syndrome, and mortality raise concerns about its long-term durability compared to SAVR.
Article Details
Authors (14)
Abdalhakim Shubietah
Advocate Illinois Masonic Med Ctr, Chicago, Illinois, United States
Ahmed Emara
Mohamed Elgendy
Mohamed Murad
Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar university, Cairo, Egypt
Hamza Abdul-Hafez
An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine, State of
Anwar Zahran
Mohammad Bdair
Mohammad Alqadi
The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States
Abubakar Nazir
The Jewish Hospital- Mercy Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Ayman Khaled
An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine, State of
AlMothana Manasrah
UHS-WIlson Medical Center, Binghamton, New York, United States
Mohammad Abuawwad
Cairo University, Amman, Jordan
Maysam Tawba
Al Qassimi Women's and Children's, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
Abdalrahman Assaassa
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States