Abstract 4359065: Inequities in Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Use for Palpitations in the United States

S Sakshi Wadhwa (BIDMC, Brookline, Massachusetts, United States) C Cancan Zhang (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, Massachusetts, United States) K Kenneth Mukamal (BIDMC-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States)

Abstract

Introduction: Palpitations may be an early manifestation of serious arrhythmias. Disparities in cardiovascular care by sex, race, and geography are well documented, but whether disparities exist in evaluation of palpitations with electrocardiography (ECG) use is unknown. Research Questions/Hypothesis: Among patients presenting with palpitations, are there demographic differences in who receives an ECG? Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2014–2016 and 2018–2019. We included outpatient visits for adults (≥18 years) with a chief complaint of palpitations. We excluded surgical visits and visits with participants with congestive heart failure or coronary artery disease. We used weighted log-binomial regression to assess associations between ECG use and patient and provider characteristics, including sex, race/ethnicity, provider specialty, visit type, metropolitan statistical area (MSA) status, insurance type, and age. We report prevalence ratios (PR) and their associated 95% confidence intervals. Analyses were conducted using R version 4.3.2. Results/Data: A total of 494 visits, representing ~21.9 million United States outpatient visits, were included. The median age was 57 years; 70% were female, and 93% resided in metropolitan areas; 68% were non-Hispanic White. Overall, 34.8% (95% CI: 25.7-45.1%) of visits included an ECG. Rural residence was significantly associated with lower ECG use (PR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.03-0.55). Patients with new or exacerbated chronic problems were more likely to receive an ECG (PR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.03-2.47). Medical specialists tended to be more likely than primary care practitioners to perform ECGs (PR 1.75, 95% CI: 0.92-3.30). No significant differences were observed by sex, race/ethnicity, or insurance status. Conclusion(s): Despite the importance of ECGs in evaluating palpitations, only one-third of visits for palpitations included an ECG. Visits in rural settings were less likely to receive an ECG, highlighting geographic inequities in early cardiovascular evaluation. These findings highlight the need for improved access and standardization in diagnostic care for symptomatic patients, particularly in rural settings.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (3)

S

Sakshi Wadhwa

BIDMC, Brookline, Massachusetts, United States

C

Cancan Zhang

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, Massachusetts, United States

K

Kenneth Mukamal

BIDMC-Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States