Abstract 4357661: Outcomes of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients with Baseline Noninducibility

N Nathaniel Christian-Miller (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States) K Kelly Arps (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States) M Michael Ghannam (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States) J Jackson Liang A Aman Chugh (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States) H Hamid Ghanbari T Thomas Crawford (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States) H Hakan Oral (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States) R Rakesh Latchamsetty (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States) F Frank Bogun (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States) A Amrish Deshmukh (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States)

Abstract

Background: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) induction identifies targets for ablation and is an important procedural endpoint. Ablation approaches and outcomes for patients noninducible for VT at baseline are not well described. Research question: What are the procedural characteristics and outcomes for patients presenting for VT ablation with baseline noninducibility? Methods: Patients at a single VT referral center who were noninducible at the start of a VT ablation procedure were retrospectively identified. All procedures were performed under monitored sedation. Baseline induction consisted of programmed stimulation with up to 4 extrastimuli from 2 or more ventricular sites at 2 or more drive cycles with or without isoproterenol. Ablation strategies, procedural outcomes, and long-term results were characterized. Results: A total of 27 of 160 patients referred for ablation were identified to have baseline noninducibility for VT (mean age 59 ± 13 years, 81% male, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 48 ± 16%, ischemic cardiomyopathy 41%, nonischemic cardiomyopathy 30%, Table). Prior ablation had been performed in 10/27 (37%) and 20/27 (74%) were previously treated with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Mapping strategies included pace mapping of device electrograms (14/23, 61%) or prior EKGs (1/23, 4%) and pace or activation mapping of premature ventricular complexes perceived to match the clinical VT (13/23, 57%). Ablation of low voltage, fractionated, or late electrogram regions was performed in 6/27(22%). Ablation based on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)-identified myocardial scar was performed in 7/27 (26%). VT remained noninducible in 22/23 (96%) of patients where programmed stimulation was repeated after ablation. One patient had arterial pseudoaneurysm following ablation, treated with thrombin injection. Mean follow-up was 1100 ± 967 days. VT recurred in 6/27 (22%) with a mean of 462 ± 466 days until first appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy (Figure). At last follow-up, AADs were continued in 13/27 (48%) patients but had been discontinued or reduced in 16/20 (85%) prescribed AADs pre-ablation. A total of 5/27 (19%) of patients died during follow-up at a mean of 1229 ± 652 days after ablation. Conclusion: VT ablation in patients noninducible at baseline was feasible and well-tolerated with infrequent VT recurrence. Prospective studies are needed to identify optimal ablation endpoints for this population.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (11)

N

Nathaniel Christian-Miller

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

K

Kelly Arps

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

M

Michael Ghannam

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

J

Jackson Liang

A

Aman Chugh

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

H

Hamid Ghanbari

T

Thomas Crawford

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

H

Hakan Oral

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

R

Rakesh Latchamsetty

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

F

Frank Bogun

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

A

Amrish Deshmukh

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States