Abstract 4357557: Renal Denervation versus Baroreflex Activation Therapy in Resistant Hypertension: Outcomes from a Real-World Registry
Abstract
Background: Device-based therapies for hypertension, including renal denervation and baroreflex activation therapy, offer alternative strategies for blood-pressure control. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX to compare adults (≥18 y) with resistant hypertension who underwent renal denervation (RDV) or baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) through October 2024, assessing efficacy and safety at 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks post-procedure after propensity score matching. Results: After propensity-score matching (215 patients per arm), patients were followed for 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks. At week 4, RDV achieved blood-pressure targets less often than BAT—RRs: 0.612 for SBP ≤ 130 mm Hg, 0.664 for DBP ≤ 80 mm Hg, 0.690 for SBP ≤ 130 or DBP ≤ 80, 0.674 for SBP ≤ 140, 0.772 for DBP ≤ 90, and 0.788 for SBP ≤ 140 or DBP ≤ 90 (all p < 0.005)—but had lower rates of AKI (0.420, p = 0.012), serious adverse events (SAEs) (0.289, p < 0.001), and hypotension (0.480, p < 0.001), with no differences in hospitalization, MACE, mortality, electrolyte disturbances, peripheral edema, headache, or dizziness. This trend persisted at week 8, with BP-target RR 0.615–0.775 (p ≤ 0.001) and continued reductions in AKI (0.323, p = 0.001), SAEs (0.342, p < 0.001), and hypotension (0.462, p < 0.001), while peri-procedural complications trended lower (0.571, p = 0.103) and other safety outcomes remained unchanged. At week 12, RDV again showed lower BP control (RR 0.636–0.805, p ≤ 0.002) with sustained reductions in AKI (0.278), hypotension (0.521), and SAEs (0.399) (all p < 0.001), and no change in hospitalization, MACE, mortality, biochemical abnormalities, peripheral edema, headache, or dizziness. By week 26, RDV continued to underperform in BP control—RR 0.69 for SBP ≤ 130 mm Hg, 0.66 for DBP ≤ 80 mm Hg, 0.73 for SBP ≤ 130 or DBP ≤ 80 mm Hg, 0.73 for SBP ≤ 140 mm Hg (all p < 0.001), and 0.83 for DBP ≤ 90 mm Hg or SBP ≤ 140/DBP ≤ 90 mm Hg (p = 0.005)—but maintained fewer SAEs (0.45, p < 0.001) and hyperkalemia (0.39, p = 0.005), with no differences in MACE, mortality, hospitalization, AKI, other electrolyte disturbances, or peripheral edema, headache, or dizziness. Conclusion: BAT achieved superior and sustained blood-pressure reductions relative to RDV, whereas RDV consistently conferred a more favorable safety profile, with significantly fewer AKI episodes, serious adverse events, and hypotension through 26 weeks.
Article Details
Authors (14)
Abdalhakim Shubietah
Advocate Illinois Masonic Med Ctr, Chicago, Illinois, United States
Mohamed Elgendy
Mohamed Rakab
Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
Ameer Awashra
An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine, State of
Ahmed Emara
Mohammad Alqadi
The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States
Qutaiba Qafisheh
University of toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States
Abubakar Nazir
The Jewish Hospital- Mercy Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Muath Baniowda
University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Osayd Tanbouz
An Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine, State of
Elsayed Balbaa
Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
Emmanuel Olumuyide
Advocate Masonic Medical Center IL, Chicago, Illinois, United States
Hasan Munshi
St. Josephs University Medical Ctr, Paterson, New Jersey, United States
Abdalrahman Assaassa
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States