Abstract 4355624: Reperfusion Strategies For Medium And Distal Vessel Occlusion: A Systematic Review And Network Meta-Analysis.

A Amiel Aragon Cortes (Universidad Autnoma de Baja California, Tijuana, Mexico) R Ricardo Alberto Orozco Santiago (Universidad Autonoma de Baja California, Tijuana, Mexico) A Adolfo Calderon-Fernandez (Universidad Autnoma de Baja California, Tijuana, Mexico) V Valentina Torrico Beltran (Universidad Catolica Boliviana, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia, Plurinational State of) L Luis E. Cueva (Universidad Nacional de Piura, Piura, Peru) D Dilmareth Natera (University of Minnesota, Shakopee, Minnesota, United States) J Jose Gasca (Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali, Colombia) K Karoly Pamela Zuñiga Montaño (Universidad Católica Boliviana “San Pablo”, Santa Cruz, Bolivia., Santa Cruz, Bolivia, Plurinational State of) O Olga Nataly Polania Perez (Universidad de Santander, Cucuta, Colombia) A Andrea Cristina Beltran De la Fuente (Universidad Mexico Americana Del No, Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico) D Diego López Mena (Instituto Nacional de Neurologia y Neurocirujia, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico)

Abstract

Evidence on the most effective treatment for stroke due to distal and medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) remains unclear, as existing meta-analyses compare heterogeneous groups. We conducted a network meta-analysis to directly and indirectly compare different treatments for DMVOs: We performed a comprehensive search of databases through April 2025 to identify studies comparing endovascular treatment (EVT) with other therapies in DMVOs. We included 31 studies with EVT, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), medical management (MM), and conservative management (CM) groups, including 7500 patients. Outcomes assessed included 90-day favorable modified Rankin Scale (mRS0–2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality.: Compared to CM, EVT was associated with a higher rate of mRS 0–2 (RR:2.79, CI:95% 1.28–6.11, p = 0.01), while MM and IVT showed no significant differences. For mRS 3–6, CM (RR:3.05, CI:95% 1.43–6.55, p = 0.004) and thrombolysisIVT (RR:1.34, CI:95% 1.01–1.77, p = 0.04) carried greater risk than EVT. MM (RR: 0.59, CI:95% 0.35–1.00, p = 0.0498), IVT (RR:0.57, CI:95% 0.29–1.10, p = 0.10), and CM (RR:0.14, CI:95% 0.005–4.16, p = 0.26) showed non-significant lower sICH risk compared to EVT. No significant differences were found in 90-day mortality.: EVT consistently showed a favorable profile for mRS 0–2 at 90 days, with a non-significant increase in sICH and in 90-day mortality. These findings support EVT to improve functional recovery in DMVOs.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (11)

A

Amiel Aragon Cortes

Universidad Autnoma de Baja California, Tijuana, Mexico

R

Ricardo Alberto Orozco Santiago

Universidad Autonoma de Baja California, Tijuana, Mexico

A

Adolfo Calderon-Fernandez

Universidad Autnoma de Baja California, Tijuana, Mexico

V

Valentina Torrico Beltran

Universidad Catolica Boliviana, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia, Plurinational State of

L

Luis E. Cueva

Universidad Nacional de Piura, Piura, Peru

D

Dilmareth Natera

University of Minnesota, Shakopee, Minnesota, United States

J

Jose Gasca

Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali, Colombia

K

Karoly Pamela Zuñiga Montaño

Universidad Católica Boliviana “San Pablo”, Santa Cruz, Bolivia., Santa Cruz, Bolivia, Plurinational State of

O

Olga Nataly Polania Perez

Universidad de Santander, Cucuta, Colombia

A

Andrea Cristina Beltran De la Fuente

Universidad Mexico Americana Del No, Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico

D

Diego López Mena

Instituto Nacional de Neurologia y Neurocirujia, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico