Abstract 4354732: Longitudinal LDL-C Control Among Patients With ASCVD and Elevated Baseline LDL-C: Insights From the cvMOBIUS-2 Registry
Abstract
Background: Prior cross-sectional studies have documented poor low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD); however, there are limited data on whether LDL-C control improves over time and whether certain patient groups have better or worse control trajectories. Methods: Using the cvMOBIUS-2 registry, which includes electronic health record data from adults with ASCVD across 17 US academic medical centers, we analyzed LDL-C levels over time amongst those with a starting LDL-C level ≥70 mg/dL and at least one follow-up LDL-C measurement after a minimum of 6 months of available follow-up. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess factors associated with higher LDL-C levels over time, accounting for repeated measurements within individuals. Results: Between 1/1/2019 and 6/24/2023, 414,736 ASCVD patients (median age, 68.5 years; 48% women) with a median baseline LDL-C of 98.0 mg/dL (interquartile range [IQR], 82.0–123.0 mg/dL) were included. The median number of follow-up LDL-C measurements per patient was 3 (IQR, 1–4). At the time of the final LDL-C measurement (median 27.9 months [IQR, 15.9–43.9 months] from baseline), the median LDL-C had decreased to 83.0 mg/dL (IQR, 66.0–107.0 mg/dL). However, approximately 70% of patients had not achieved an LDL-C <70 mg/dL and 87% had not achieved an LDL-C <55 mg/dL. Factors associated with higher LDL-C levels over time included Medicaid coverage (β = +6.0 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5–6.6; vs Medicare) and the absence of recurrent ASCVD events (β = +15.4 mg/dL; 95% CI, 15.1–15.7). Conclusion: Among ASCVD patients receiving care in academic medical centers, those with a baseline LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL often exhibited persistently elevated LDL-C levels over time, and more than two-thirds did not achieve recommended levels during follow-up. Notably, patients without recurrent ASCVD events had worse longitudinal LDL-C control. These findings highlight that even patients without recurrent ASCVD events, who are often considered clinically stable, need improved lipid-lowering strategies to achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C levels.
Article Details
Authors (12)
Satoshi Shoji
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Nishant Shah
Duke University Medical Center, Cary, North Carolina, United States
Peter Shrader
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Nikki Freeman
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Vera Bittner
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Tanya Wilcox
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Doran Amanda C
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Cezary Wojcik
Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, United States
Ran Jin
Laney Jones
Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, United States
Eric Peterson
UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
Ann Marie Navar