Abstract 4353276: Biomarkers of myocardial injury in community-based patients with suspected heart failure
Abstract
Introduction: Myocardial injury is a hallmark of the syndrome of heart failure (HF). It is unknown whether established (e.g. troponin) or novel biomarkers of myocardial injury (e.g. cardiac myosin-binding protein C [cMyBP-C]) offer additive diagnostic value to natriuretic peptide concentrations in patients presenting in the community with signs and symptoms suggestive of HF. Methods: Community-based patients with suspected HF and elevated NT-proBNP levels were recruited into a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted at 5 outpatient sites (NCT04724200). Venous blood collection was performed at the time of transthoracic echocardiography. A HF diagnosis was made according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) phenotypes: HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) = ≤40%, HF with mildly reduced ejection (HFmrEF) = 41-49%, and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) = ≥50% and HFA-PEFF score ≥5. NT-proBNP (Roche Elecsys assay), high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (cTnT-hs, Roche Elecsys assay) and cMyBP-C (Roche precommercial assay) were analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy of each biomarker alone and in combination was examined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results: Of the 867 patients enrolled, 751 (87%) had a measurable LVEF and available biomarker data. Of these, 43 (6%) had HFrEF, 75 (10%) HFmrEF, and 278 (37%) HFpEF. Median NT-proBNP levels were highest in those with HFrEF compared to other HF phenotypes and patients without HF (n=355, 47%). Similar results were seen for hsTnT and cMyBP-C. The Spearman correlations between biomarkers and echocardiographic parameters are displayed in Table 1. When considering a diagnosis of HF vs. no HF, the combination of NT-proBNP and cMyBP-C had the highest AUROC of 0.77 (95%CI 0.73-0.80) vs. NT-proBNP alone (0.74 [0.71-0.78]), p for comparison=0.003 - Figure 1 . After exclusion of those with HFmrEF/HFpEF, the AUROC to detect HFrEF (vs. no HF) was 0.90 (0.86-0.95) for the combination of NT-proBNP and cMyBP-C, vs. 0.85 (0.80-0.90) for NT-proBNP alone (p=0.006) - Figure 2 . Conclusion: The measurement of cMyBP-C, a novel biomarker of chronic myocardial injury, improved the diagnostic accuracy of NT-proBNP in patients with suspected HF in the community. The additive value was greatest in the detection of HFrEF. The measurement of cMyBP-C, in addition to NT-proBNP, may help in the prioritization of echocardiography for those with suspected HF in the community.
Article Details
Authors (15)
Kieran Docherty
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Mark Petrie
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Gemma McKinley
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Alex McConnachie
Katriona Brooksbank
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
David Lowe
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Leanne Macklin
NHS Forth Valley, Larbert, United Kingdom
Aimee McCoubrey
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Joanna Osmanska
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Daniel Taylor-Sweet
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Malbinder Fagura
AstraZeneca, Luton, United Kingdom
Tatjana Ammer
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS LTD, Rotkreuz, Switzerland
Serge Masson
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS LTD, Rotkreuz, Switzerland
John McMurray
British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Ross Campbell