Abstract 4348064: Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Following Lead Extraction for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infections in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

F Faiz Baqai (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States) A Alexandra Lewis (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States) D Derrick Draeger (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States) E Emily Xiao (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States) P Patrick Lynch (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States) M Mihail Chelu (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States)

Abstract

There is a class I recommendation for lead extraction in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. However, in patients supported by left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) the calculus is more complicated due to multiple prior vascular accesses, long lead dwell times, LVAD hardware infections, and the inherent risks of performing invasive procedures in a hemodynamically fragile population. Comprehensive outcome data to guide management in this subset of patients is limited. We aimed to evaluate the procedural efficacy, complication rates, and mortality following CIED lead extraction in patients with LVADs who developed device-related infections. A systematic literature review of five electronic databases was conducted. We included all published studies of LVAD patients undergoing lead extraction for CIED-related infection and our unpublished, retrospectively gathered institutional cohort. The primary outcome was the pooled rate of complete procedural success. Secondary outcomes included minor and major procedural complications and 30-day and 1-year mortality. Outcomes of interest were pooled and analyzed using a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird). Heterogeneity was quantified using I^2 and τ^2 statistics. Seven published observational studies and our unpublished institutional data comprised 88 patients (22.7% female, mean age 58.7 years). The pooled rate of complete procedural success was 91% [95% CI: 86%–94%]. Minor complications occurred in 12% [95% CI: 9%–17%]. The 30-day mortality was 18% [95% CI: 3%–60%] and the 1-year mortality was 30% [95% CI: 17%–49%]. Heterogeneity was low to moderate across outcomes (I^2: 0–31.5%). No procedural mortality or major complications were reported. CIED lead extraction in LVAD recipients with device-related infection is associated with high procedural success and low complication rates. The lack of major complications associated with lead extractions suggests that the high post-extraction mortality is a consequence of the high-risk population rather than the procedure itself. Our results suggest that when clinically indicated, CIED lead extraction in LVAD recipients is a feasible and effective intervention.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (6)

F

Faiz Baqai

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States

A

Alexandra Lewis

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States

D

Derrick Draeger

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States

E

Emily Xiao

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States

P

Patrick Lynch

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States

M

Mihail Chelu

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States