Abstract 4347078: Reclaiming Life Amid Constraint: The Ventricular Assist Device Experience

A Avery Bechthold (University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States) R Rachel Wells M Martha Abshire Saylor (Johns Hopkins University, Eldersburg, Maryland, United States) C Colleen McIlvennan (UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, Denver, Colorado, United States) D Dan Matlock (UNIVERSITY COLORADO, Aurora, Colorado, United States) D Debra Moser (UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States) J James Dionne-Odom (UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM, Birmingham, Alabama, United States)

Abstract

Background: Ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation requires adoption of complex self-management routines, including device monitoring, dressing changes, assessing for complications, and responding to acute events. While these lifestyle changes significantly alter daily life, little is known about how VAD recipients adapt to these changes and sustain participation in valued roles and routines post-VAD implantation. Research Question: How do adult VAD recipients continue to engage in meaningful activities after implantation? Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted among 12 adult VAD recipients from an outpatient clinic in the Southeastern U.S. Participants completed a semi-structured interview discussing changes in their ability to engage in meaningful activities after implantation. Thematic analysis identified key themes and subthemes. Results: Participants (n=12; ages 39–76 years; 42% rural) were predominantly male (67%), with half identifying as non-Hispanic Black (50%). Two themes emerged reflecting the dual impact of VAD implantation: (1) VAD support enables patients to reengage in meaningful activities, relationships, and roles; and (2) Patients must identify and avoid activities that pose a threat to their safety and well-being. Participants described a renewed ability to engage in light hobbies and household tasks after implantation, largely due to improved physical functioning, symptom relief, and extended survival. These improvements also allowed some to reclaim disrupted family and community roles. However, these benefits came with the need for increased planning and caution to avoid potentially hazardous situations. This involved modifying or giving up physically demanding, water-based, or spontaneous activities, as well as aspects of certain self-care and social activities, due to safety concerns and physical limitations. Changes also affected their self-expression and identity, with challenges with their clothing, intimacy, and independence. Despite these limitations, many expressed gratitude for the life-sustaining benefits of the VAD. Conclusions: These findings offer guidance for clinicians to help patients anticipate both increased engagement in certain meaningful activities and the need for lifestyle changes to ensure safety. Additional research is needed to identify predictors of continued engagement in meaningful activities post-VAD and long-term effects on psychological and device-related outcomes.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (7)

A

Avery Bechthold

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States

R

Rachel Wells

M

Martha Abshire Saylor

Johns Hopkins University, Eldersburg, Maryland, United States

C

Colleen McIlvennan

UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, Denver, Colorado, United States

D

Dan Matlock

UNIVERSITY COLORADO, Aurora, Colorado, United States

D

Debra Moser

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

J

James Dionne-Odom

UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM, Birmingham, Alabama, United States