Abstract 4346591: Cardiovascular Diagnoses Following Smartwatch Irregular Pulse Notifications: Insights from the Apple Heart Study

E Eduardo Perez Guerrero (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States) S Shyon Parsa (Stanford University Hospital, Mountain View, California, United States) D Diona Gjermeni (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States) M Maria Sakalaki (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States) P Pouria Alipour (University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) K Kevin Yu (Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia) H Haley Hedlin (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States) M Manisha Desai (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States) A Adam Phillips (Apple, Inc., Cupertino, California, United States) A Andrea Russo C Christopher Granger (Duke Health, Durham, North Carolina, United States) P Peter Kowey (LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States) M Mellanie Hills (StopAfib.org, Greenwood, Texas, United States) J JOHN RUMSFELD (University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States) M Mintu Turakhia (Stanford University; iRhythm Technologies, Inc., Stanford, California, United States) K Kenneth Mahaffey (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States) M Marco Perez (Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.)

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and early detection is important for stroke prevention. The Apple Heart Study (AHS) demonstrated that wearable devices capable of irregular pulse notifications (IPN) can aid in identifying AF. The rates of subsequent diagnoses of cardiovascular disease (CVD) remain unknown. Hypothesis: We aimed to evaluate how smartwatch-detected IPNs are associated with key cardiovascular diagnoses. We hypothesized that, among AHS participants, receiving IPNs would be associated with increased odds of subsequently reporting major cardiovascular diagnoses compared to participants without IPNs. Methods: Out of 419,297 enrolled AHS participants, 288,533 (69%) individuals who completed the end-of-study survey (EOS) were included in this analysis. The self-reported diagnoses consisted of heart failure (HF), stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI), and pulmonary embolism (PE), considered individually and as a composite (MACE). Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for each diagnosis among IPN versus non-IPN participants, adjusted for sex, age, and CHA2DS2-VASc components. Results: The EOS survey was completed by 908 notified participants (42% among the IPN cohort) and 287,625 non-notified participants (69% among the non-IPN cohort). IPN recipients were older, more often male, and had a higher comorbidity burden and CVD risk factors than the total cohort (Table 1). The IPN cohort reported higher rates of HF, MI, stroke, TIA, and PE compared to those who did not receive an IPN (Table 2). The fully adjusted logistic regression analysis showed increased odds of each diagnosis among the IPN group (Figure 1). Conclusions: Participants with an IPN had higher odds of subsequently reporting major adverse cardiovascular diagnoses. These associations may reflect pre-existing conditions, underlying CVD risk, and comorbidities among participants who received an IPN, which has a high positive predictive value (PPV) for detecting AF. Given the elevated odds and high PPV, IPNs may warrant clinical consideration of evaluation for CVD or comorbidities, and future studies should assess the diagnostic and management pathways following IPNs.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (17)

E

Eduardo Perez Guerrero

Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States

S

Shyon Parsa

Stanford University Hospital, Mountain View, California, United States

D

Diona Gjermeni

Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States

M

Maria Sakalaki

Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States

P

Pouria Alipour

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

K

Kevin Yu

Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia

H

Haley Hedlin

Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States

M

Manisha Desai

Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States

A

Adam Phillips

Apple, Inc., Cupertino, California, United States

A

Andrea Russo

C

Christopher Granger

Duke Health, Durham, North Carolina, United States

P

Peter Kowey

LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States

M

Mellanie Hills

StopAfib.org, Greenwood, Texas, United States

J

JOHN RUMSFELD

University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States

M

Mintu Turakhia

Stanford University; iRhythm Technologies, Inc., Stanford, California, United States

K

Kenneth Mahaffey

Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States

M

Marco Perez

Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.