Abstract 4346591: Cardiovascular Diagnoses Following Smartwatch Irregular Pulse Notifications: Insights from the Apple Heart Study
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and early detection is important for stroke prevention. The Apple Heart Study (AHS) demonstrated that wearable devices capable of irregular pulse notifications (IPN) can aid in identifying AF. The rates of subsequent diagnoses of cardiovascular disease (CVD) remain unknown. Hypothesis: We aimed to evaluate how smartwatch-detected IPNs are associated with key cardiovascular diagnoses. We hypothesized that, among AHS participants, receiving IPNs would be associated with increased odds of subsequently reporting major cardiovascular diagnoses compared to participants without IPNs. Methods: Out of 419,297 enrolled AHS participants, 288,533 (69%) individuals who completed the end-of-study survey (EOS) were included in this analysis. The self-reported diagnoses consisted of heart failure (HF), stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI), and pulmonary embolism (PE), considered individually and as a composite (MACE). Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for each diagnosis among IPN versus non-IPN participants, adjusted for sex, age, and CHA2DS2-VASc components. Results: The EOS survey was completed by 908 notified participants (42% among the IPN cohort) and 287,625 non-notified participants (69% among the non-IPN cohort). IPN recipients were older, more often male, and had a higher comorbidity burden and CVD risk factors than the total cohort (Table 1). The IPN cohort reported higher rates of HF, MI, stroke, TIA, and PE compared to those who did not receive an IPN (Table 2). The fully adjusted logistic regression analysis showed increased odds of each diagnosis among the IPN group (Figure 1). Conclusions: Participants with an IPN had higher odds of subsequently reporting major adverse cardiovascular diagnoses. These associations may reflect pre-existing conditions, underlying CVD risk, and comorbidities among participants who received an IPN, which has a high positive predictive value (PPV) for detecting AF. Given the elevated odds and high PPV, IPNs may warrant clinical consideration of evaluation for CVD or comorbidities, and future studies should assess the diagnostic and management pathways following IPNs.
Article Details
Authors (17)
Eduardo Perez Guerrero
Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
Shyon Parsa
Stanford University Hospital, Mountain View, California, United States
Diona Gjermeni
Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
Maria Sakalaki
Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
Pouria Alipour
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Kevin Yu
Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia
Haley Hedlin
Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
Manisha Desai
Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
Adam Phillips
Apple, Inc., Cupertino, California, United States
Andrea Russo
Christopher Granger
Duke Health, Durham, North Carolina, United States
Peter Kowey
LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States
Mellanie Hills
StopAfib.org, Greenwood, Texas, United States
JOHN RUMSFELD
University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States
Mintu Turakhia
Stanford University; iRhythm Technologies, Inc., Stanford, California, United States
Kenneth Mahaffey
Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
Marco Perez
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.