Abstract 4343575: Expedited outpatient work-up is safe for evaluation of some emergency department patients with chest pain

A Alex Lyapin (Stanford Health Care, Stanford , California, United States) S Sandra Tsai (Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States) N Neil Kalwani (Stanford Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford, California, United States) R Ryan Batchelder (Stanford Health Care, Stanford , California, United States) S Shashank Ravi (Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States) N Nelofar Barlas (Stanford Health Care, Stanford , California, United States) A Abha Khandelwal (Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States) C Charlene Kell (Stanford Health Care, Santa Clara, California, United States) M Mircea Gafencu (Stanford Health Care, Santa Clara, California, United States) E Eleanor Levin (STANFORD UNIVERSITY, Los Altos, California, United States)

Abstract

Background: Chest pain is a common presenting symptom in the emergency departments (EDs). Safe and timely outpatient evaluation is reasonable for some patients without acute coronary syndrome. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of an expedited outpatient diagnostic pathway for patients with chest pain at moderate risk of adverse cardiac events. Methods: A multidisciplinary team designed a pathway consisting of a stress ECG within 5 days, and a cardiology visit with an advanced practice provider within 7 days, of ED discharge. Patients presenting with chest pain were eligible if they had non-critical high-sensitivity troponins (< 35 ng/L for men, <17 ng/L for women), were at least moderate risk of adverse cardiac events (HEART score ≥4), were able to complete exercise stress ECG testing, and had insurance coverage for outpatient care. Data on patient compliance with the pathway, stress ECG results, and 30-day ED returns, were collected from 12/1/2023 to 11/30/2024. Results: Over twelve months, 55 patients met pathway criteria and were discharged from ED. Of these, 52 patients (95%) either completed the pathway or elected to follow-up with an established cardiology provider: 38 had outpatient stress ECG, 4 had coronary computed tomography angiogram (CCTA) per ED, and 10 followed up with established providers. There were 3 patients lost to follow-up. Of the 38 stress ECGs, 4 were abnormal (10%) and led to more imaging with three being negative for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and one showing obstructive CAD, leading to invasive coronary angiography and stenting. One patient with a positive stress ECG was sent to ED from diagnostic lab for additional testing, which turned out negative. No patients re-presented to the ED with acute coronary syndrome within 30 days. Conclusion: A novel expedited outpatient pathway for evaluation of patients with chest pain showed a high completion rate, low rates of abnormal stress testing, and no acute coronary syndrome ED visits within 30 days. Pathways allowing for expedited outpatient evaluation of chest pain especially for patients without established cardiology care may reduce ED length of stay and avoid observation stays for stress testing while maintaining high standards of patient care. Future research should focus on evaluating long-term outcomes and assessing opportunities to implement similar pathways for other patient populations to optimize resource utilization while enhancing the patient experience.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (10)

A

Alex Lyapin

Stanford Health Care, Stanford , California, United States

S

Sandra Tsai

Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States

N

Neil Kalwani

Stanford Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford, California, United States

R

Ryan Batchelder

Stanford Health Care, Stanford , California, United States

S

Shashank Ravi

Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States

N

Nelofar Barlas

Stanford Health Care, Stanford , California, United States

A

Abha Khandelwal

Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States

C

Charlene Kell

Stanford Health Care, Santa Clara, California, United States

M

Mircea Gafencu

Stanford Health Care, Santa Clara, California, United States

E

Eleanor Levin

STANFORD UNIVERSITY, Los Altos, California, United States