Abstract 4342257: Beyond Heritability: Multimodal AI Integrating Imaging and Genetics Enables Population-Scale Precision Coronary Artery Disease Risk Prediction

D Devansh Pandey (University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States) L Liaoyi Xu (University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States) E Eucharist Kun (University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States) J Joyce Wang (University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States) C Chenfei Li (State Key Laboratory of Synergistic Chem-Bio Synthesis, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering) J Julie DiCarlo (University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States) A Alaa Melek (University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States) E Edward Castillo C Charles Taylor (University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States) J Jagat Narula V Vagheesh Narasimhan (University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States)

Abstract

Introduction: Identifying asymptomatic individuals and treating them based on underlying risk is a key challenge in preventing coronary artery disease (CAD). Genetic risk scores and plaque quantification from cardiac imaging have emerged as powerful tools to expand conventional risk stratification. However, these modalities have not been combined in a single predictive model. Objectives: First, to evaluate whether a multimodal AI model integrating imaging, genetic, and lipid-based risk improves prediction of 10-year incident CAD beyond clinical models. Second, to assess whether genetic risk adds predictive value after accounting for imaging. Third, to determine whether non-cardiac imaging modalities contribute independent information. Methods: We analyzed data from over 60,000 UK Biobank participants with ~4,000 CAD events after imaging. Vision models were fine-tuned on cardiac, liver, and pancreas MRI and DXA scans. Imaging embeddings were reduced using principal component analysis and integrated with a multi-ancestry PRS (trained on >2M individuals), metabolic and ECG traits, and baseline variables in a unified Cox proportional hazards model. Model performance was assessed using pseudo R 2 (leave-one-out) and commonality analysis. Results: Imaging embeddings outperformed hand-crafted image-derived phenotypes (AUC: 0.794 vs. 0.666). In joint models, only cardiac long-axis and aortic distensibility MRI contributed substantial independent value; liver, pancreas, and DXA features added minimal predictive power after adjusting for baseline traits. PRS alone explained pseudo R 2 = 0.08, while the full multimodal model reached 0.45, with imaging contributing nearly three times the incremental variance explained by genetics. Genetic and imaging signals were largely orthogonal, though some genetic risk was partially captured by imaging. A hierarchical stratification framework combining clinical, genetic, and imaging data identified a subgroup with a 10-fold increased CAD risk relative to the low-risk baseline and a 5-fold increase compared to individuals with high clinical and genetic risk. Spatial cross-validation confirmed generalizability across imaging centers (AUC: 0.785-0.822 and C-index 0.751-0.763). Conclusions: Genetic risk offers a fixed baseline of inherited susceptibility, but deep learning on non-invasive imaging adds dynamic markers of disease progression. Multimodal modeling offers a practical framework for precision CAD screening at population scale.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (11)

D

Devansh Pandey

University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States

L

Liaoyi Xu

University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States

E

Eucharist Kun

University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States

J

Joyce Wang

University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States

C

Chenfei Li

State Key Laboratory of Synergistic Chem-Bio Synthesis, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

J

Julie DiCarlo

University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States

A

Alaa Melek

University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States

E

Edward Castillo

C

Charles Taylor

University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States

J

Jagat Narula

V

Vagheesh Narasimhan

University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States