Abstract 4339015: NSTEMI Secondary to Embolic Prosthetic Valve Thrombus: A Rare Post-TAVR Complication

A Avery Love (University of Texas Medical Branch, Friendswood, Texas, United States) A Alexander Bosley (University of Texas Medical Branch, Friendswood, Texas, United States) P Peter Rasmussen (University of Texas Medical Branch, Dickinson, Texas, United States) R Ramy Abdelmaseih (University of Texas Medical Branch, Friendswood, Texas, United States) A Aiham Albaeni (University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States) A Afaq Motiwala (University of Texas Medical Branch, Friendswood, Texas, United States) K Khalil Anouti (University of Texas Medical Branch, Friendswood, Texas, United States)

Abstract

Background: Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) typically results from plaque rupture leading to obstructive coronary artery disease. However, embolic thrombi originating from cardiac structures, such as prosthetic valves, can rarely cause NSTEMI. Recognizing these uncommon embolic sources is vital for accurate diagnosis and management. Case Presentation: An 82-year-old female with severe aortic stenosis previously treated by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with a Watchman device, hypertension, diabetes, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction presented with persistent chest discomfort and palpitations. Coronary angiography revealed a thrombus extending from the distal left main artery into the ostial left circumflex artery, successfully treated via aspiration thrombectomy and balloon angioplasty [Figure 1]. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) did not detect atrial thrombi. However, cardiac computed tomography (CT) identified thrombi on the prosthetic aortic valve leaflets, confirming the valve as the embolic source [Figure 2]. Discussion: This case emphasizes that NSTEMI may result from embolic thrombus, not solely from plaque rupture. Prosthetic valves, such as those used in TAVR, are rare but recognized sources of coronary embolism. Although TEE is frequently used, it has limitations in thrombus detection; thus, cardiac CT remains the preferred imaging modality for accurate evaluation. While coumadin is traditionally recommended for anticoagulation, Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are emerging alternatives, though further studies are required to establish their efficacy. Conclusion: Clinicians should consider prosthetic valve-associated thromboembolism in NSTEMI cases post-TAVR. Cardiac CT is the optimal diagnostic tool, and future research should clarify the role of NOACs in managing prosthetic valve thrombosis.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 152, Issue Suppl_3
Published November 04, 2025
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (7)

A

Avery Love

University of Texas Medical Branch, Friendswood, Texas, United States

A

Alexander Bosley

University of Texas Medical Branch, Friendswood, Texas, United States

P

Peter Rasmussen

University of Texas Medical Branch, Dickinson, Texas, United States

R

Ramy Abdelmaseih

University of Texas Medical Branch, Friendswood, Texas, United States

A

Aiham Albaeni

University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States

A

Afaq Motiwala

University of Texas Medical Branch, Friendswood, Texas, United States

K

Khalil Anouti

University of Texas Medical Branch, Friendswood, Texas, United States