Abstract 15: Rural-Urban Differences in Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity Among Older U.S. Adults: Findings from the REGARDS Study

M Michael Hankes (University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States) E Erin Dooley (University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States) S Stephen Clarkson (University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States) H Harshvardhan Singh (Department of Chemistry) F Fitzgerald Dodds (University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States) M McKenna Tharpe (University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States) S Silvienne Sint Jago (University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States) T Tyler Bagley (University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States) V Virginia Howard (University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States) S Suzanne Judd (University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States) R Raymond Jones (University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States)

Abstract

Introduction: Older adults in rural areas face elevated chronic disease risk and greater barriers to physical activity (PA). We determined how PA patterns vary across the rural-urban spectrum using the Rural Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) 4-category system, incorporating a broad set of demographic and health variables. Hypothesis: Rural residents would engage in less moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary behavior (SB), but more light-intensity physical activity (LIPA) compared to urban residents. Methods: Accelerometer data (Actical™) from REGARDS participants collected between 2009 and 2013 were analyzed across RUCA category: isolated, small rural, large rural, and urban. PA was categorized into three intensity domains based on activity counts per minute (CPM): SB (<50), LIPA (50–1064), and MVPA (≥1065). Multivariable general linear models identified education and income as significant PA determinants, which were retained in fully adjusted linear regression models. Models were sequentially adjusted for wear time, demographic and socioeconomic factors, and health-related covariates. Interaction terms were tested for effect modification of covariates on rurality and SB, LIPA, and MVPA. Results: Of the 30,239 Black and White adults aged ≥45 years enrolled in REGARDS between 2003 and 2007, 8,098 had accelerometer data, and 7,317 had valid RUCA Classification ( Table ). Urban residents engaged in the most SB (691 min/d) and least LIPA (188 min/d) ( Figure) . Compared to urban residents, those in isolated and small rural areas engaged in significantly more LIPA and less SB ( Table ). MVPA levels were low across all RUCA groups (avg 13.1 min/d), with no statistically significant group differences. A significant interaction was observed between education and RUCA category for LIPA (p= 0.03). Individuals in small rural areas with less than a high school education engaged in significantly more LIPA than urban residents with a college education (estimate = 46.65 min/d, p=0.0014). Conclusions: We observed uniformly low levels of MVPA across all RUCA categories. Rural–urban differences in overall PA were more strongly influenced by variations in LIPA and SB. These patterns underscore the role of income, education, and environmental context in shaping physical activity disparities. It remains unclear whether shared barriers contribute to low MVPA across RUCA classes or whether distinct factors promote higher LIPA in certain rural populations.

Article Details

Journal Circulation
Volume / Issue Vol. 153, Issue Suppl_1
Published March 24, 2026
ISSN 0009-7322
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Circulation

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0009-7322 Health Sciences

Authors (11)

M

Michael Hankes

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States

E

Erin Dooley

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States

S

Stephen Clarkson

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States

H

Harshvardhan Singh

Department of Chemistry

F

Fitzgerald Dodds

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States

M

McKenna Tharpe

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States

S

Silvienne Sint Jago

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States

T

Tyler Bagley

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States

V

Virginia Howard

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States

S

Suzanne Judd

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States

R

Raymond Jones

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States