Absence of lymphocytosis after starting treatment with cbtki is a rare phenomenon except for CD49d positive CLL mainly expressed in trisomy 12.
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cBTKi) have revolutionized the treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). They target Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK), which mediates BCR signaling, and triggers pathways involved in cell survival, proliferation and migration. BTK inhibition in neoplastic lymphocytes results in their demarginalization from lymph nodes into peripheral blood, leading to redistribution lymphocytosis, characterized by a transient increase in absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) after therapy initiation. However, cases of absent or attenuated lymphocytosis after treatment initiation have been reported in literature, particularly in patients with trisomy 12 (+12), the clinical impact of this phenomenon remains unclear. Trisomy 12 cells show increased expression of adhesion integrins LFA-1, Mac-1 and VLA4-4, promoting retention of +12 CLL cells within tissues. The aim of this study was to describe CLL patients treated with cBTKi who did not show any lymphocytosis after treatment initiation and its impact on Progression-free survival (PFS), Time to next treatment (TTNT) and Overall survival (OS). Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 346 treatment-naïve CLL patients from 16 Italian centers, all treated with target-dose ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, or zanubrutinib. We assessed the median ALC at baseline and on days +15, +30, +60, +90, +120, +180, +270 and +360. Then we conducted a descriptive statistical analysis based on clinical and biological characteristics. Additionally, clinical outcomes as PFS, TTNT and OS were assessed in 284 patients with sufficient follow-up. The study was carried out according to the Helsinki Declaration, Good Clinical Practice, and the applicable national regulations and was approved by the local ethic committee. Results: We identified 51/346 patients (15%) who did not develop lymphocytosis following cBTKi initiation. These patients demonstrated a persistent reduction in ALC from day 15 onward. No significant differences in lymphocyte kinetics or frequency of non-lymphocytosis were found between the three cBTKi. According to the cytogenetic profile, 45% had CLL with +12, 18% del(17p), 25% del(11q), 35% del(13q) and 12% normal karyotype. Only for 22/51 patients we had data about CD49d (VLA-4 integrin alfa subunit) expression before starting treatment: 16/22 (73%) patients CD49d+ and 6/22 (27%) CD49d-. Regarding immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV) gene mutational status: 71% had unmutated IGHV and 29% had mutated IGHV. No statistical differences in lymphocyte kinetics were observed between mutated and unmutated IGHV. We noticed that the +12 patients (23 patients) had a smaller increase in blood lymphocytosis from the first to the sixth month. In +12 CLL patients, we did not study the specific role of CD49d+ due to its widespread expression (89%) in this group of patients. We further analyzed the role of CD49d in patients without +12 (28 patients) to detect the independent role of CD49d. All the 37 CD49d+ CLL patients showed a more pronounced reduction in lymphocyte counts during the first 3 months of therapy. Clinical outcomes were assessed in 284 patients, comparing those with (n=244) and without (n=40) cBTKi-induced lymphocytosis. No significant differences were observed in PFS, TTNT and OS, regardless of presence or absence of lymphocytosis (PFS p=0.9651; TTNT p=0.5346; OS p=0.6848). Conclusion: The absence of lymphocytosis during cBTKi therapy in CLL is associated with specific biological features, notably CD49d expression and trisomy 12. CD49d appears to be the key driver of the no-lymphocytosis phenotype, while +12 may have an indirect role due to its strong association with CD49d. Importantly, lack of lymphocytosis after cBTKi treatment does not correlate with inferior outcomes (PFS, TTNT, OS) comparing patients with or without lymphocytosis, independently of CD49d expression. Future studies with larger cohorts and extended follow-up are warranted to clarify the prognostic impact of CD49d on long-term outcomes in this setting.
Article Details
Authors (30)
Luca Laurenti
2Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy
Feliciana Guglielmi
2Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
Antonio Mosca
2Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
Candida Vitale
42Division of Hematology, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino and Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
Maria Chiara Montalbano
3University of Torino and Division of Hematology, Turin, Italy
Gianmarco Favrin
University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
Isacco Ferrarini
21Hematology unit, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine Section of Biomedicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Andrea Galitzia
22Struttura complessa di Ematologia, Ospedale S Francesco, ASL Nuoro, Nuoro, Italy
Raffaella Pasquale
8Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
Massimo Moratti
7Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Udine, Italy
Gioacchino Catania
8Hospital Saints Antonio, Biagio and Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
Roberta Murru
11Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Ospedale Oncologico A. Businco, ARNAS “G. Brotzu”, Cagliari, Italy
Diana Giannarelli
Enrica Martino
5Hematology Unit AO of Cosenza, Cosenza, Italy
Riccardo Moia
32Division of Hematology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
Antonella Zucchetto
3Clinical and Experimental Onco-Hematology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Aviano, Italy
Erika Tissino
3Clinical and Experimental Onco-Hematology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Aviano, Italy
Francesco Autore
1Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
Annamaria Tomasso
30Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
Luca Stirparo
14Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
Tommaso Quaranta
2Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
Pier Luigi Abbate
2Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
Valter Gattei
3Clinical and Experimental Onco-Hematology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Aviano, Italy
Gianluca Gaidano
13Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
Massimo Gentile
Azienda Ospedaliera Annunziata, Cosenza, Italy
Mauro Krampera
18Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Section of Biomedicine of Innovation, Department of Engineering for Innovative Medicine (DIMI), University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Giuliana Farina
14AORN Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano, Caserta, Italy
Marzia Varettoni
4Division of Hematology, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Marta Coscia
15Division of Hematology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi ASST Sette Laghi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
Idanna Innocenti
14Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy