Ab initio molecular dynamics prediction and experimental validation of the 14:4 rare-earth oxide-phosphate structure
Abstract
Rare-earth oxide-phosphates (historically termed oxyphosphates) occupy the compositional space between RE 2 O 3 and REPO 4 and form during REPO 4 melting and high-temperature degradation of REPO 4 -based environmental barrier coatings. For several reported stoichiometries, reliable structural models remain unavailable because these phases are low-symmetry, large–unit-cell compounds that seldom form crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Here, we predict the crystal structure of the compounds reported in the literature as “RE 8 P 2 O 17 ” (RE: Sm to Lu, Y) by combining finite-temperature ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations with targeted experiments. Syntheses and electron microprobe analysis show the correct RE:P ratio is 3.5, corresponding to RE 14 P 4 O 31 (14:4). Starting from the melt, AIMD simulations in the SLUSCHI framework, followed by symmetry-constrained relaxation, yield a complex (62 distinct oxygen sites on general positions), monoclinic Pc structure which represents a hitherto unknown structure type. It can be described as a defect fluorite (bixbyite, C -type RE 2 O 3 ) structure penetrated along one direction by tunnels containing (PO 4 ) tetrahedra. The structure was initially predicted for Y 14 O 15 (PO 4 ) 4 and was validated for RE = Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, and Y against synchrotron or laboratory X-ray powder diffraction patterns. Extending the model across the rare-earth series yields consistent lattice trends and places all oxide-phosphates RE 14 O 15 (PO 4 ) 4 within 46 meV/atom of the 0 K convex hull. A finite-temperature free-energy analysis from MD trajectories predicts entropy stabilization of Y 14 O 15 (PO 4 ) 4 above ~1,305 K, reconciling metastability at 0 K with observed synthesis and helping resolve discrepancies among published Y 2 O 3 –YPO 4 phase diagrams.
Article Details
Journal Info
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
Authors (12)
Qi-Jun Hong
School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University
Sergey V. Ushakov
Navrotsky-Eyring Center for Materials of the Universe, School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University
Ligen Wang
School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University
Konrad Burkmann
Navrotsky-Eyring Center for Materials of the Universe, School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University
Jared Matteucci
Navrotsky-Eyring Center for Materials of the Universe, School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University
Jun Wu
Andrew Fitch
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility
Chathuranga S. Witharamage
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia
Hongwu Xu
Navrotsky-Eyring Center for Materials of the Universe, School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University
Elizabeth J. Opila
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia
Robert Glaum
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Alexandra Navrotsky
Navrotsky-Eyring Center for Materials of the Universe, School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University