A theoretical index for understanding distinct land relative humidity trends in observations, reanalyses, and models

W Wenyu Zhou (Atmospheric, Climate, and Earth Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory) L L. Ruby Leung (Atmospheric, Climate, and Earth Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory) B Bryce E. Harrop (Atmospheric, Climate, and Earth Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory) Z Ziming Chen (Department of Mechanical Engineering) C Chuan-Chieh Chang (Atmospheric, Climate, and Earth Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)

Abstract

Land surface relative humidity (RH) is a key variable in the coupled land–atmosphere system that profoundly influences terrestrial hydroclimate and ecosystems. Yet historical changes in land RH are not well understood due to limited observations, biased reanalyses, and the lack of a framework for interpreting RH changes under multiple influencing factors. Here, we show that the spatiotemporal variability of land RH and its distinct historical trends among observations, reanalyses, and Earth system models are captured by a simple index based on the ratio of precipitation (P) to a modified potential evapotranspiration formulated independently of RH ( P E T o ). The index provides a physical calibration of biased land RH in reanalyses and a quantitative framework for interpreting land RH changes. Over 1973–2024, land RH has decreased substantially, owing to the intrinsic rise in P E T o with temperature and little increase in land precipitation. Reanalyses overestimate the observed RH decrease, consistent with exaggerated surface warming and precipitation decline. The index captures this coherent bias and enables a calibration using observed precipitation and temperature. Models simulate a wide range of land RH trends, but nearly all runs underrepresent the historical drying. The index captures the model spread and discrepancy and attributes them to contributions of precipitation and P E T o . Weaker land RH decreases in models arise mainly from weaker subtropical precipitation declines, linked to muted intensification of subtropical highs and biased subtropical climatology. The model–observation discrepancy is unlikely explained by internal variability, implying model underestimation of forced RH decrease and a drier land future than current projections.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 123, Issue 10
Published March 10, 2026
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (5)

W

Wenyu Zhou

Atmospheric, Climate, and Earth Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

L

L. Ruby Leung

Atmospheric, Climate, and Earth Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

B

Bryce E. Harrop

Atmospheric, Climate, and Earth Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

Z

Ziming Chen

Department of Mechanical Engineering

C

Chuan-Chieh Chang

Atmospheric, Climate, and Earth Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory