A T-cell–based metric of immune age predicts outcomes in older patients with myeloma receiving daratumumab-based therapy
Abstract
Abstract Immunotherapy has transformed the treatment landscape of multiple myeloma (MM), a hematological cancer predominantly affecting older individuals. Yet, whether immune aging, shaped by intrinsic aging processes, genetics, and external factors, affects treatment efficacy remains unclear. To address this, we investigated the influence of age on the immune system in patients with MM and explored whether immune aging associates with clinical outcomes in older patients. Using flow cytometry, we conducted high-dimensional profiling of T cells and natural killer cells in peripheral blood and bone marrow samples of 124 older (>65 years) and 145 younger (≤65 years) patients with newly diagnosed MM (ages 34-92 years) enrolled in the HOVON-143 and CASSIOPEIA/HOVON-131 trials. On average, older patients exhibited a more activated, differentiated, and senescent T-cell compartment than younger patients. Nonetheless, substantial interindividual variation in T-cell subset frequencies within both age groups indicated that calendar age inadequately reflects an individual’s immune status. We therefore developed an immune clock on high-dimensional phenotypic T-cell data to quantify each patient’s “immune age,” revealing substantial variation in immune ages among patients of similar calendar age. Importantly, immune age appeared a stronger predictor of clinical outcomes than calendar age in older, nonfit patients with newly diagnosed MM receiving daratumumab-ixazomib-dexamethasone, even after adjusting for frailty and other established risk factors. Overall, these findings highlight immune age as a clinically relevant composite metric that better reflects a patient’s immune status than their calendar age. Validating this methodology in other immunotherapy settings may improve our ability to predict immunotherapy efficacy in older patients with MM or other hematological cancers.
Article Details
Authors (18)
Wassilis S. C. Bruins
1Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Febe Smits
6Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Carolien Duetz
1Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Kaz Groen
1Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Charlotte L. B. M. Korst
1Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
A. Vera de Jonge
1Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Christie P. M. Verkleij
1Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Rosa Rentenaar
1Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Meliha Cosovic
1Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Merve Eken
1Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Inoka Twickler
1Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Paola M. Homan-Weert
1Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Pieter Sonneveld
Philippe Moreau
Jürgen Claesen
6Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Niels W. C. J. van de Donk
Sonja Zweegman
Tuna Mutis
6Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands