A systemic risk assessment methodological framework for the global polycrisis
Abstract
Abstract Human societies and ecological systems face increasingly severe risks, stemming from crossing planetary boundaries, worsening inequality, rising geo-political tensions, and new technologies. In an interconnected world, these risks can exacerbate each-other, creating systemic risks, which must be thoroughly assessed and responded to. Recent years have seen the emergence of analytical frameworks designed specifically for, or applicable to, systemic risk assessment, adding to the multitude of tools and models for analysing and simulating different systems. By assessing two recent global food and energy systemic crises, we propose a methodological framework applicable to assessing systemic risks in a polycrisis context, drawing from and building on existing approaches. Our framework’s polycrisis-specific features include: exploring system architectures including their objectives and political economy; consideration of transformational responses away from risks; and cross-cutting practices including consideration of non-human life, trans-disciplinarity, and diversity, transparency and communication of uncertainty around data, evidence and methods.
Article Details
Authors (28)
Ajay Gambhir
Michael J. Albert
Sylvanus S. P. Doe
Jonathan F. Donges
Nadim Farajalla
Leandro L. Giatti
Haripriya Gundimeda
Sarah Hendel-Blackford
Thomas Homer-Dixon
Daniel Hoyer
Sumaya Adan
David Jacome-Polit
Luke Kemp
David Korowicz
Zora Kovacic
Jan Kwakkel
Multi Actor Systems Department, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology
Laurie Laybourn
Robert Lempert
Ayan Mahamoud
Tom H. Oliver
Ivana E. Pavkova
Joseph Ponnoly
Vishwas Satgar
Megan Shipman
Jana Sillmann
Nick Silver
Samuel Stevenson
Ruth Richardson