A systematic review protocol: Efficacy and safety of nitrous oxide in analgesia in burn patients with dressing change
Abstract
Background To alleviate pain in burn patients during dressing changes, it is necessary to identify an effective analgesic method. Conventional opioid analgesics have many limitations. Nitrous oxide is a fast-acting, safe and reversible inhaled analgesic gas. This systematic review will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nitrous oxide in the treatment of pain during dressing changes in burn patients. Method The protocol was developed according to the PRISMA-P checklist and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024550197). A systematic search will be performed in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library to identify clinical trials comparing nitrous oxide inhalation with standard care in pain management during dressing changes in burn wounds. The search of all databases will be conducted on October 15, 2025.Our search scope will include studies published between each database creation and search date.Two researchers will independently screen studies, extract data, and evaluate study quality using the Risk of Bias2 tool. Primary outcomes will include pain, anxiety, side effects, among others.R statistical software (version 4.3.1) and R studio will be used to perform meta-analyses.Effect size will be expressed by 95% confidence interval (Cl) of weighted mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR). Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore sources of heterogeneity and assess the robustness of the results.Publication bias will be assessed using funnel plot and Egger test. We will use the Grading of Recommendation, Evaluation, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to assess the quality of the evidence. Discussion Operative pain has always been a difficult problem for burn patients. This study will evaluate the analgesic effect of nitrous oxide on dressing change in burn patients through comprehensive search and rigorous methods, and provide evidence support for clinical decision-making.
Article Details
Authors (11)
Weifeng Wang
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University
Xianli Meng
Yan Zhao
Wei Gong
Xiaochen Jiang
Wenjuan Cao
Xueling Qiu
Chenxi Sun
Fan Sun
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Fiber Materials, Key Laboratory of Science and Technology of Eco-Textile, Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Yuchen Wang
State Key Laboratory of Animal Biodiversity Conservation and Integrated Pest Management, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Lu Tang
State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials, College of Chemistry, Jilin University, Qianjin Avenue, Changchun 130012, P. R. China