A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of vaccination on prevention of long COVID

R Rhiannon Green Z Zoe Marjenberg G Gregory Y. H. Lip A Amitava Banerjee J Juan Wisnivesky B Brendan C. Delaney M Michael J. Peluso (Department of Medicine, University of California) E Elke Wynberg S Sultan Abduljawad

Abstract

Abstract Long COVID affects millions worldwide and its prevention is a critical public health strategy. While prior analyses show primary vaccination prevents long COVID in subsequent infections, the effect of booster vaccination on long COVID after Omicron infections is unclear. This systematic review identifies 31 observational studies, of which 11 are suitable for pairwise meta-analyses. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of long COVID in those vaccinated (any dose) versus unvaccinated is 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70–0.85; p < 0.0001; 10 studies). ORs were also lower for primary course vaccination versus unvaccinated (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.79–0.83; p < 0.0001; 3 studies), booster vaccination versus unvaccinated (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63–0.86; p = 0.0001; 4 studies), and booster vaccination versus primary course vaccination (OR 77; 95% CI 0.65–0.92; p = 0.0044; 3 studies). These findings indicate that booster vaccination can provide additional protection against long COVID, highlighting the importance of seasonal vaccination against new SARS-CoV-2 variants. They should, however, be interpreted cautiously, given the small number of studies and the low quality of evidence.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 16, Issue 1
Published November 24, 2025
ISSN 2041-1723
Publisher Nature Portfolio

Journal Info

Nature Communications

Nature Portfolio

ISSN: 2041-1723 Open Access Life Sciences

Authors (9)

R

Rhiannon Green

Z

Zoe Marjenberg

G

Gregory Y. H. Lip

A

Amitava Banerjee

J

Juan Wisnivesky

B

Brendan C. Delaney

M

Michael J. Peluso

Department of Medicine, University of California

E

Elke Wynberg

S

Sultan Abduljawad