A randomized phase III trial of catequentinib hydrochloride (AL3818) versus placebo in subjects with metastatic or advanced leiomyosarcoma (LMS).
Abstract
11506 Background: Catequentinib Hydrochloride (AL3818, Anlotinib, Catequentinib) is a novel, orally administered, small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor. There remains an unmet need for effective, well tolerated therapies for patients (pts) with advanced/ metastatic leiomyosarcoma (LMS). We performed a randomized, double blind trial of Catequentinib monotherapy versus placebo in advanced/metastatic LMS. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of LMS requiring third or further line treatment were eligible. Catequentinib was administered in a 21-day cycle with 14 days on and 7 days off regimen. In this double blind phase 3 trial, patients were randomized 2:1 to Catequentinib or placebo, with the option of crossover to Catequentinib after confirmed Progression Disease (PD) on placebo. Progression-free survival (PFS) with Log Rank test was the primary endpoint and the trial was conducted at multiple sites in the US, UK and EU. Results: Total N = 111 patients were enrolled, and N = 110 were treated and evaluated, 74 randomized to Catequentinib (C), and 36 to placebo (P). In arms (C)/(P) median ages were 59.0/60.5 (range: 33-91) years respectively and 59/29 (79.7%/80.6%) were female. Median PFS by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) met the primary endpoint at 3.42 months (95% CI: 2.60, 6.83) for (C) and 1.41 months (95% CI: 1.35, 4.86) for (P) with a p-value of 0.0265 and a HR of 0.536 (95% CI: 0.307, 0.936). Median PFS for patients stratified at ≤ 3 prior lines was 4.86 months (95% CI: 2.04, 8.94) for (C) and 1.41 months (95% CI: 1.31, 4.86) for (P) with a p-value of 0.0046 and a HR of 0.386 (95% CI: 0.196, 0.760). The 6-month progression-free rate was 42.37% for (C) and 20.71% for (P). OS was 17.45 months (95% CI: 13.57, 19.32) for (C) and 16.33 months (95% CI: 11.27, NE) for crossover patients in the (P) arm. 30 (40.5%) of patients have experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events in the (C) arm compared to 3 (8.3%) of patients in the (P) arm. The most common TEAE for (C) vs (P) were diarrhea (50.0% vs 22.2%), stomatitis (31.1% vs 8.3%), fatigue (64.9% vs 41.7%), and hypertension (47.3% vs 19.4%). Conclusions: This phase 3 trial met the primary PFS endpoint and demonstrates superior PFS for Catequentinib vs placebo in metastatic/advanced LMS. This study confirms the acceptable benefit-risk profile of Catequentinib in LMS. Catequentinib is an effective and well tolerated treatment option for patients with LMS. Clinical trial information: NCT03016819 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (17)
Robin Lewis Jones
Royal Marsden Hospital, London, Chelsea, United Kingdom
Neal Shiv Chawla
Sarcoma Oncology Center, Santa Monica, CA
Steven Attia
avin Ratan, MD, MEd, Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Bernd Kasper, MD, PhD, Sarcoma Unit, Mannheim University Medical Center, Mannheim Cancer Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Thierry Alcindor, MD, MS, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Patrick Schöffski, MD, Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Winette T. van der Graaf, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Noah Federman, MD, Departments of Pediatrics and Orthopedics, UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA; Nam Q. Bui, MD, Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Gina D'Amato, MD, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL; Richard...
Seth Pollack
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
Lee D. Cranmer
City of Hope National Medical Center Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, Duarte, CA
Antonio Lopez-Pousa
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Medical Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
Mahesh Seetharam
Division of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Melissa Amber Burgess
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
Bartosz Chmielowski
Brittany L. Siontis
Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
Jonathan C. Trent
University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL
Breelyn A. Wilky
Nam Bui
Rashmi Chugh
Neeta Somaiah
Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Brian Andrew Van Tine
Washington University, St. Louis, MO
Sant P. Chawla
Sarcoma Oncology Center, Santa Monica, CA