A randomized phase 2 trial of nivolumab, relatlimab plus ipilimumab vs. nivolumab plus ipilimumab in first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma.

E Eric Jonasch (Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA) N Nizar M. Tannir A Andrew Warren Hahn (Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) S Sangeeta Goswami P Pavlos Msaouel A Amishi Yogesh Shah (Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) R Rebecca Slack Tidwell H Hyunsoo Hwang (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) L Lauren Michelle Wood (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) M Mashaal Syed (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) T Travis Solley (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) S Sara Fares (MD Anderson, Houston, TX) L Lauren S Lewis (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) E Elaine Brooks (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) H Heddy Bartell (Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ) D Daniel J. George (Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC) N Naomi Balzer Haas (Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) M Michael R. Harrison (Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC) H Hans J. Hammers (UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) B Brian I. Rini

Abstract

TPS580 Background: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab (ipi/nivo) is a standard of care for treatment-naïve, metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). While durability of response may be superior to combination therapy with PD-1 inhibitors and agent tyrosine kinase inhibitors, ipi/nivo has a relatively low objective response rate (ORR) and relatively high progressive disease (PD) as best response. Building on the benefits of ipi/nivo through additional immune manipulation has biologic rationale and could expand the efficacy of this regimen. Lymphocyte-associated gene 3 (LAG3) is an inhibitory receptor on activated immune cells that plays a role in T cell exhaustion. LAG3 is expressed on T cells and is co-expressed with other inhibitory receptors such as PD-1. This co-expression induces the disfunction of T cells and thus limits the anti-tumor T cell response. Relatlimab is a human LAG-3-specific antibody that binds to the LAG-3 receptor with high affinity and blocks LAG-3 interactions with its canonical ligand, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class II, which is the peptide antigen presentation molecule recognized by CD4+ T cells. Relatlimab binding inhibits the negative regulatory function of LAG-3 in vitro. Relatlimab restores effector function of exhausted T cells. Combined LAG3 inhibition with relatlimab and PD-1 inhibition with nivolumab was recently demonstrated in the RELATIVITY-047 melanoma study. These compelling preclinical and clinical data have led to the hypothesis that adding relatlimab to ipilimumab plus nivolumab will increase objective response rate in patients with metastatic ccRCC. Methods: This is a phase 2 randomized, multicenter, study investigating the efficacy of nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W), relatlimab 160 mg Q4W and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 8 weeks (Q8W) intravenous (IV) versus a doublet arm treating with nivolumab 480 mg Q3W and ipilimumab 1mg/kg Q3W IV followed by maintenance nivolumab in first-line advanced ccRCC. Co-primary endpoints include safety and ORR. Up to 60 patients with treatment naive, biopsy-proven ccRCC with adequate organ/marrow function with at least one evaluable lesion by RECIST 1.1 will be enrolled and randomized 2:1 to the experimental arm versus ipi/nivo. Ongoing safety and futility monitoring will employ a 2-arm Bayesian optimal phase 2 (BOP2) design. Sample size provides 64% power at a one-sided 0.15 significance level to detect a difference between the arms assuming the overall response rates are 40% vs. 60% for nivo/ipi vs. experimental arm, respectively. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival and OS. To explore the effects of the treatment on inducing activated T cell infiltration, biopsies and circulating immune cell subsets will be obtained for single cell analysis and spatial transcriptomic studies. Over 10 patients are enrolled at the time of submission. Clinical trial information: NCT06708949 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

E

Eric Jonasch

Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

N

Nizar M. Tannir

A

Andrew Warren Hahn

Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

S

Sangeeta Goswami

P

Pavlos Msaouel

A

Amishi Yogesh Shah

Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

R

Rebecca Slack Tidwell

H

Hyunsoo Hwang

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

L

Lauren Michelle Wood

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

M

Mashaal Syed

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

T

Travis Solley

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

S

Sara Fares

MD Anderson, Houston, TX

L

Lauren S Lewis

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

E

Elaine Brooks

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

H

Heddy Bartell

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ

D

Daniel J. George

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

N

Naomi Balzer Haas

Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

M

Michael R. Harrison

Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

H

Hans J. Hammers

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

B

Brian I. Rini