A randomized phase 2 study of an individualized neoantigen-targeting immunotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic microsatellite stable colorectal cancer (MSS-CRC).
Abstract
LBA13 Background: Neoantigen-targeting immunotherapy aims to provide therapeutic benefit to patients by generating potent neoantigen-specific T cells. GRANITE is an immunotherapy regimen that uses chimpanzee adenovirus and self-amplifying mRNA vaccines encoding patient-specific neoantigens in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Preliminary efficacy was noted in MSS-CRC (Palmer et al Nature Medicine 2022) and this regimen is being assessed in a randomized Phase 2 study in 1L metastatic MSS-CRC (NCT05141721). Methods: Patients (pts) with 20 neoantigens based on the EDGEÔ prediction model were randomized 1:1 to receive the GRANITE regimen in addition to 1L standard of care (SOC) (GRANITE vaccine arm), or 1L SOC alone (control arm). Results: Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were balanced between arms. As of 15 Oct 2024, GRANITE pts had an improvement in PFS relative to control pts (HR=0.73, 90% CI [0.44, 1.21]). In this study, high and low disease burden groups were identified using baseline ctDNA assessed by Gritstone’s validated, highly sensitive, tumor-informed assay. Patients with low disease burden benefited more than those with high disease burden, consistent with emerging data suggesting neoantigen-targeting immunotherapy having greater activity in minimal disease settings (e.g., adjuvant setting). Furthermore, in the low disease burden group at the most recent study visit, more patients were free of progression with very low ctDNA levels (ie, below the limit of quantification of the assay) in the GRANITE arm, 41% (7/17), versus the control arm, 21% (3/14). The greater proportion of GRANITE patients both free of progression and with very low ctDNA, suggests potential further separation of PFS cuves with additional follow up. Neoantigen-specific T cell responses were observed in 100% of patients in the GRANITE arm with evaluable PBMC samples (17/17 assessed by ex vivo and in vitro stimulation ELISpots). Molecular responses based on a reduction in ctDNA at a single timepoint was similar between arms (39% in GRANITE and 40% in control arms). Most common (≥20%) treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) included pyrexia and influenza like illness and no pts discontinued due to a TRAE. Conclusion: This randomized study shows GRANITE may benefit patients, especially those with low burden disease, in this front line setting of metastatic MSS-CRC that has not benefitted from immunotherapy. Updated analysis will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT05141721 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Joel R. Hecht
David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Alexander I. Spira
Virginia Cancer Specialists and NEXT Oncology-Virginia, Fairfax
Anthony V. Nguyen
Comprehensive Cancer Centers Nevada US Oncology, Henderson, NV
Lyudmyla Derby Berim
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
Alexander Starodub
Christ Hospital, Cincinnati
Meredith Pelster
Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville
David Gallinson
Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ
Anup Kasi
University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
Matthew Reilley
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
Agustin Pimentel
University of Miami, Miami, FL
Ki Young Chung
PRISMA Health Cancer Institute, Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Boiling Springs, SC
Fa-Chyi Lee
University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA
Brian Chauder
Gritstone bio, Inc, Emeryville, CA
Kyounghwa Bae
Gritstone bio, Inc, Emeryville, CA
Desiree Schneck
Gritstone bio, Inc, Emeryville, CA
Andrew R. Allen
Gritstone bio, Emeryville, CA
Karin Jooss
Gritstone bio, Emeryville, CA
Andrew R. Ferguson
Pheast Therapeutics, Redwood City, MA
J. Thaddeus Beck
Highlands Oncology, Springdale, AR