A prospective, multicenter study on stem cell mobilization using EAP regimen as first-line mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma
Abstract
Abstract Background: The optimal stem cell mobilization strategy in multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma remains debatable. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of integrating etoposide, cytarabine, and pegfilgrastim (EAP) regimen in patients with MM and lymphoma. Methods: This phase 2 trial, spanning 12 hospitals in China, enrolled adults aged 18–75 with MM or lymphoma suitable for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT). The EAP regimen comprised etoposide 75 mg/m2/day for two days, cytarabine 200 mg/ m2 twice daily for two days, and pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 6. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who attained adequate mobilization (≥2.0´106 CD34+ cells/kg); secondary endpoints included safety and other mobilization efficacy indicators. Results: Between November 2022 and April 2024, 65 patients were enrolled. All patients achieved adequate mobilization, with a median of 14.7×106 CD34+ cells/kg (range: 2.7–47.1) collected. A median of 1.1 apheresis sessions was needed, and 59 patients (90.8%) attained optimal thresholds (≥5.0´106 CD34+ cells/kg). The median time to the first apheresis post-mobilization was 12.5 days, with plerixafor rescue required in 3.1% of the cases. Following post-mobilization, 13.8% of patients developed grade 2–3 infections, while 36.9% required platelet transfusions. In 80.0% of patients who underwent auto-HSCT, the median neutrophil and platelet engraftment times were 10.7 and 11.6 days, respectively. Conclusion: The EAP regimen demonstrates an optimal efficacy and safety profile, making it a promising alternative for stem cell mobilization in MM and lymphoma, particularly in populations with plerixafor-inaccessible.
Article Details
Authors (26)
Peipei Ye
1Department of Hematology, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
Weiying Feng
Linjie Li
Key Laboratory of Pathogen Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Lin Qingqing
1Department of Hematology, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
Jie Jin
School of Emergency Management, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering
Huixian Hu
5Department of Hematology, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
Hongyan Tong
Qunyi Guo
10Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, China
Sai Chen
Gongqiang Wu
3Dongyang Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China
Jiaping Fu
State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan 430074, China
Liangshun You
1The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China., Hematology, Hangzhou, China
Huang Li
Jing Le
Huifang Jiang
4Department of Hematology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
Yangxi Jin
3Department of Hematology, College of Medicine, Lishui Hospital, Zhejiang University, Lishui, China
Jian Shen
Linlong Xu
5Department of Hematology, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, China
Wanzhuo Xie
1First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
Dong Chen
Shuangyue Li
Chao Hu
Lihong Shou
8Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, China
Renzhi Pei
Jingcheng Zhang
Ying Lu