A pilot single-arm, pragmatic trial in progress of in-home versus in-clinic subcutaneous nivolumab administration through Cancer Care (connected access and remote expertise) Beyond Walls (CCBW) program.
Abstract
TPS1657 Background: Cancer treatments are traditionally administered in clinical settings, which can isolate patients from their familiar environments and exacerbate physical, psychosocial, and financial burdens. Travel requirements further amplify these challenges, particularly for underserved populations. Studies indicate that patients prefer receiving care at home, and international models have demonstrated the safety of home-delivered chemotherapy since the 1990s; however, no U.S. clinical trial data exists. In response, Mayo Clinic has developed the Cancer CARE (Connected Access and Remote Expertise) Beyond Walls (CCBW) program, a distributed cancer care delivery model that expands access to quality cancer care by bringing it to the home environment, providing in-home cancer treatment, lab testing, telemedicine, and community paramedic support. This trial evaluates the safety, acceptability, and impact of home-based subcutaneous (SC) nivolumab (Nivo) administration compared to in-clinic treatment within the CCBW initiative. Methods: This open-label, single-arm trial evaluates the impact of SC Nivo administration location—home versus infusion center—on patient reported cancer care experience, patient-preferred treatment location, acceptability, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. Eligible adult patients (ECOG 0-1) receiving IV Nivo for an FDA-approved indication and residing within 75 miles of Mayo Clinic Florida will transition to SC Nivo, receiving two initial in-clinic cycles. If tolerated without injection reactions, four cycles will be administered at home before resuming in-clinic treatment. Exclusion criteria include concurrent investigational/standard treatments or contraindications to immunotherapy. Fifty patients will be enrolled, with an estimated 75% (n=38) providing cancer care ratings after 8 weeks in-clinic and 8 weeks at-home, offering 85% power to detect a mean difference in ratings of 0.50 standard deviations. The primary endpoint is within-patient change in cancer care rating (0–10 scale, CAHPS Cancer Care Survey) comparing 8 weeks of in-clinic vs. at-home care. Secondary endpoints include patient-preferred treatment location, comfort with home injections, safety (grade 3+ adverse events), function (EORTC QLQ-F17), symptoms (PRO-CTCAE), side effect impact (GP5), and healthcare utilization (ER visits, hospitalizations). Cost will be assessed as a tertiary endpoint. The trial has FDA approval (IND #170079), Mayo Clinic IRB approval (#23009663), and ClinicalTrials.gov registration (NCT06265285). Enrollment began in April 2024, with an expected accrual period of 24 months. To date, 10 patients have been enrolled, and final analysis is expected 2.5 years after trial activation. Clinical trial information: NCT06265285 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Dina Elantably
Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
Jeremy Clifton Jones
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
Yanyan Lou
Gina L. Mazza
Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Chanice Howard
Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
Sunnie Confiado
Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
Amber Baskin
Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
Alexis Jackson
Angela Hazel Fritsche
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Kaila Lopez
Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
Jade Brown
Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
Luci Nolan
Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
Dustin Chapin
Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
Gregory Beliles
Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
Nathan Smith
Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Winston Tan
Mohamed Kharfan-Dabaja
2Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, United States
Grzegorz S. Nowakowski
Cheryl Willman
21Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Roxana Stefania Dronca
Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL