A phase III randomized trial of pembrolizumab in combination with sacituzumab govitecan vs standard of care in anti–PD-(L)1–resistant advanced urothelial cancer: ECOG-ACRIN EA8231.
Abstract
TPS4641 Background: Patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) who progress after anti-PD-(L)1 therapy (CPI-R) and enfortumab vedotin (EV) have relatively limited treatment options and poor outcomes. SG, a TROP-2–directed antibody–drug conjugate (ADC), has meaningful efficacy in previously treated la/mUC, while SG plus pembro achieved 41% overall response rate (ORR; 20% complete response rate) in platinum-refractory la/mUC. With rapidly evolving treatment paradigms and earlier use of EV and anti-PD(L)1, the frequency of CPI-R la/mUC is expected to increase; therefore, newer combinations and the role of anti-PD(L)1 re-challenge should be prospectively evaluated in previously treated la/mUC. We hypothesized that SG/pembro combination would improve outcomes over standard chemotherapy (SOC) in pts previously treated with anti-PD(L)1. Methods: EA8231 is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase III trial enrolling adults with unresectable la/mUC. Key eligibility criteria: a) ECOG PS 0-2 b) Prior anti-PD(L)1 given in any disease setting but no cancer progression within 12 weeks from starting prior anti-PD(L)1initiation c) Prior exposure to EV unless contraindicated d) ≥1 lines of systemic therapy for la/mUC [ FGFR3 altered tumors must have received prior FGFR inhibitor unless contraindicated] e) Bellmunt score 0-2 f) No prior exposure to SG or other TROP-2 directed therapies or drugs containing topo-isomerase I inhibitor. Treatment: Pts are randomized 1:1 to Arm A SOC (platinum-gemcitabine or taxane Q3 week cycle) OR Arm B pembro/SG (Pembro 200mg on day 1 + SG 10mg/kg on days 1, 8 of a 21-day cycle with G-CSF support). Pts are stratified by Bellmunt score (0-1 vs 2), prior lines of therapy (≤2 vs >2), prior exposure to platinum-based chemotherapy (yes vs no prior exposure and platinum-eligible vs no prior exposure and platinum-ineligible), duration of prior anti PD-(L)1 therapy (≤6 vs >6 months). G-CSF primary prophylaxis is strongly recommended, esp. with SG. Endpoints : Primary endpoint: overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints: progression-free survival, ORR, clinical benefit rate, duration of response, safety/tolerability, health related QOL (NFBlSI-18; FACIT-Fatigue; EQ-5D-5L). Statistical plan: Trial is designed to demonstrate 42.5% improvement in median OS [platinum-ineligible cohort: median OS increase from 9 to 12.8 months; platinum-eligible cohort: median OS increase from 10.3 to 14.7 months]; 80% power with 1-sided 0.025 type I error rate; HR (pembro+SG/SOC) 0.70, N=320. Trial Status: Activation date: 10/23/2025 (1 patient accrued as of Jan 6, 2026; 28 approved sites, additional sites pending). Clinical trial information: NCT06524544 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Monika Joshi
Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA
Se Eun Kim
Petros Grivas
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
Elizabeth Wulff
University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
Alicia K. Morgans
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Kriti Mittal
UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA
Joshua Warrick
Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
Melissa A. Reimers
Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
Noah M. Hahn
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Naomi Balzer Haas
Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Lynne I. Wagner
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Michael A. Carducci
Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD