A phase II study of fruquintinib plus sintilimab as a second-line therapy for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC): Updated results.

M Min Jin (Division of Psychology, State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, International Data Group/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University) S Shengli Yang (Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) J Junli Liu (Engineering Research Center of Advanced Rare Earth Materials, Department of Chemistry) J Jieying Zhang (Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) L Lei Zhao (School of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Pesticide and Chemical Biology of Ministry of Education, and Hubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, Central China Normal University) D Dandan Yu Z Zhenyu Lin P Pindong Li (Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) J Jing Wang (Hunan Cancer Hospital Changsha China) J Jun Xue H Hong Ma J Jianli Hu (Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) T Tao Zhang H Hongli Liu

Abstract

407 Background: Preliminary results of the open-label, single-arm phase II study (NCT05625737) had demonstrated the combination of fruquintinib and sintilimab as a second-line therapy had a promising anti-tumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in pts with advanced GC/GEJC (ASCO-GI 2024. Poster 332). Here, we update the results with a focus on subgroup analyses. Methods: Patients (pts) aged 18-75 years who were HER2-negative and had failed first-line standard treatment were enrolled. Eligible pts received 4mg of fruquintinib orally once daily on days 1-14 and 200 mg of sintilimab intravenously on day 1, with treatment repeated every 3 weeks. An optimal Simon two-stage design was employed. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: At data cut-off (August 25, 2024), 29 pts (7 in the first stage; 22 in the second stage) with median age 51 (range 33–73) years old had been enrolled. 41.4% were male, 37.9% had ECOG PS 1, 69% had lymph node metastasis and 72.4% had previously received immunotherapy. Among the 24 efficacy evaluable pts, the ORR was 33.3% (95% CI 15.6–55.3) and DCR was 66.7% (95% CI 44.7–84.4). After a median follow-up of 13.14 months, the median PFS was 5.13 (95% CI: 2.73–7.03) months and OS result was pending maturity. Pts who had lymph node metastasis exhibited higher ORR compared to pts without lymph node metastasis (ORR-47.1 vs 0%). In particular, pts without prior immunotherapies were more likely to achieve higher response rate (37.5 vs 33.3%) and had an obvious trend for longer PFS than pts with prior immunotherapies (9.00 vs 5.13 months). Majority of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were grade 1-2 and the most frequently reported ones (≥20%) were white blood cell decreased (33%), hypertriglyceridemia (25%), lymphocyte count decreased (21%), abdominal pain (21%) and decreased appetite (21%). Grade 3/4 TEAEs occurred in only one patient, consisting of increased blood bilirubin levels, aspartate transaminase elevation, and alanine transaminase elevation. Conclusions: Fruquintinib combined sintilimab was well tolerated, with encouraging antitumor activity as second-line treatment for advanced GC/GEJC, especially in pts without prior immunotherapies. Further studies in larger cohorts to validate these findings are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT05625737 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 4_suppl
Published February 01, 2025
Pages 407-407
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (14)

M

Min Jin

Division of Psychology, State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, International Data Group/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University

S

Shengli Yang

Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

J

Junli Liu

Engineering Research Center of Advanced Rare Earth Materials, Department of Chemistry

J

Jieying Zhang

Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

L

Lei Zhao

School of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Pesticide and Chemical Biology of Ministry of Education, and Hubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, Central China Normal University

D

Dandan Yu

Z

Zhenyu Lin

P

Pindong Li

Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

J

Jing Wang

Hunan Cancer Hospital Changsha China

J

Jun Xue

H

Hong Ma

J

Jianli Hu

Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

T

Tao Zhang

H

Hongli Liu