A phase I study of pomalidomide and nivolumab (Pom/Nivo) in patients with virus-associated malignancies with and without HIV.
Abstract
2663 Background: Up to 15% of cancers worldwide are associated with oncogenic viruses and disproportionately affect people with HIV (PWH). Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is linked to several malignancies, particularly lymphomas; Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus (KSHV) to Kaposi sarcoma (KS) and primary effusion lymphoma (PEL); and human papillomavirus (HPV) to anogenital and head and neck cancers. Virus-associated tumors evade immune surveillance through mechanisms such as T-cell exhaustion. In vitro studies show that pomalidomide (Pom), an immunomodulatory drug, enhances T-cell co-stimulation and increases immune surface marker expression in virus-infected cell lines. Pom may synergize with nivolumab (Nivo), an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, to reverse immune exhaustion and enhance antitumor immunity. Methods: This phase I study enrolled participants (pts) with advanced virus-associated malignancies (EBV, KSHV, HPV). PWH were required to receive antiretroviral therapy for ≥4 weeks with an HIV viral load (VL) ≤400 copies/mL. There was no CD4 T-cell requirement; however, major opportunistic infections (with limited exceptions) were not permitted within 6 months of enrollment. Intravenous Nivo (480 mg) was administered every 28 days with Pom given once daily on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle using a 3+3 dose-escalation design (DL1=3 mg, DL2=4 mg, optional DL-1=2 mg) for up to 24 cycles. The primary objective was safety and tolerability of the combination (using CTCAE v5.0). The secondary objective was to evaluate the anti-tumor activity of Pom/Nivo using disease-specific criteria (RECIST 1.1, Lugano criteria, or modified ACTG criteria for KS). Results: Sixteen pts (75% male, 56% White and 37% Hispanic) were enrolled, including 9 PWH with a baseline median (med) CD4 T-cell of 253 cells/mm³ (range 61-616) and HIV VL 37 copies/mL. After a med of 7 cycles (range 1-24), the most common Grade (G) 1/2 toxicities were anemia, lymphopenia, and maculopapular rash. Five pts had G3 or G4 neutropenia that was managed with growth factor support and Pom dose reductions. The only dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 1 pt with metastatic anal cancer in DL1 who developed G3 dyspnea; the maximum tolerated dose of Pom was 4 mg. Five pts were not evaluable for an objective response (2 died from progressive disease (PD), 2 declined further treatment, 1 was deemed ineligible), among 11 pts who received ≥3 cycles, all 4 pts with KS had a response (2 partial and 2 complete responses), 1 pt with PEL had stable disease (SD), 1 of 4 pts with HPV-malignancies had SD and 1 of 2 with nasopharyngeal carcinoma had SD, and 4 pts had PD. Among PWH, CD4 T-cell count did not change from baseline to the end-of-treatment (p=0.46). Conclusions: Pom/Nivo is a chemotherapy-sparing regimen with acceptable safety in advanced virus-associated cancers and promising activity in KS. Based on these results, an expanded KS cohort will be added to the trial. Clinical trial information: NCT04902443 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (10)
Jose Mercado-Matos
1National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, United States
Ijeoma Agwu
1National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, United States
Irene Ekwede
1National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, United States
Margaret Namubiru
1National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, United States
Anna Widell
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Brian Ko
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Helen X. Chen
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Robert Yarchoan
National Cancer Institute
Kathryn Lurain
9HIV and AIDS Malignancy Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Ramya Ramaswami
1National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, United States