A phase 2 study of telisotuzumab adizutecan (ABBV-400; Temab-A) in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring <i>MET</i> amplification.
Abstract
TPS3157 Background: MET amplification is a rare alteration occurring at a rate of 0.06%–4.2%, in different solid tumor types across genomic databases. It is associated with poor prognosis and has limited treatment options. Currently, there are no therapies approved specifically to target MET -amplified tumors. Temab-A is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting c-Met and conjugated to a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor payload. In a first-in-human study (NCT05029882), Temab-A demonstrated encouraging activity (objective response rate 46%) and a manageable safety profile in MET -amplified solid tumors (Murciano-Goroff et al. ESMO 2025), supporting the continued investigation of Temab-A. The present phase 2 study evaluates Temab-A in adults and adolescents (12–17 years) with relapsed/refractory advanced solid tumors harboring MET amplification. Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm, global, multicenter phase 2 study (NCT07196644) enrolling approximately 125 patients (100 global; 25 China cohort) with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors harboring MET amplification. Patients must have received ≥1 prior systemic therapy appropriate for their tumor type in the advanced/metastatic setting and have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. Patients must be ≥12 years old, have ECOG PS 0–1, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 or RANO, and documented MET amplification by local next-generation sequencing or central FoundationOne CDx. Patients are treated with Temab-A 2.4 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other discontinuation criteria are met. Trial objectives are listed in the table. Enrollment began in November 2025; as of December 2025, 1 patient has enrolled. Clinical trial information: EU CT: 2024-518871-74-00. Objectives. Primary Evaluate efficacy (ORR per ICR, RECIST v1.1/RANO) and safety of Temab-A (AEs, vital signs, ECG, clinical laboratory testing) Secondary Further assess efficacy (DOR, PFS, OS, disease control) and characterize PK and immunogenicity (PK parameters, ADAs, nADAs) Exploratory Biomarker analyses (eg, c-Met expression) and PROs evaluation ADAs, antidrug antibodies; AEs, adverse events; DOR, duration of response; ECG, electrocardiogram; ICR, independent central review; nADAs, neutralizing antidrug antibodies; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PK, pharmacokinetics; PROs, patient-reported outcomes; RANO, Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology; RECIST v1.1, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (15)
Manish R. Sharma
START Center for Cancer Research—Midwest, Grand Rapids, MI
Yonina R. Murciano-Goroff
Ofra Maimon
Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
Yuichi Ando
Sun Young Rha
Manabu Muto
Do-Youn Oh
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, and the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Gladys Morrison Thiele
AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL
Junvie Pailden
AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL
Manal Mehibel
AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL
Theodore S. Jennaro
AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL
Nancy Zhang
Graham Walker
AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL
Vivek Subbiah
David S. Hong
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston