A phase 2 study of response-guided neoadjuvant sacituzumab govitecan and pembrolizumab (SG/P) in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: Results from the NeoSTAR trial.
Abstract
511 Background: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a TROP-2 directed antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) approved for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Pembrolizumab (P), an anti-programmed death 1 monoclonal antibody, is approved for early-stage TNBC and metastatic PD-L1 positive TNBC. However, safety and efficacy of SG+P in early TNBC is not known. We published results of Arm A1 investigating neoadjuvant SG monotherapy in early TNBC (Spring et al. Annals of Onc 2024). Here we present results from Arm A2 of the NeoSTAR study investigating the combination of neoadjuvant SG + P in early-stage TNBC (NCT04230109). Methods: Patients (pts) with early TNBC (tumor size ≥2 cm or node positive) with no prior treatment were eligible. Pts received SG at starting dose of 10mg/kg on days 1,8 of a 21-day cycle for 4 cycles with P 200 mg given on day 1 of each cycle. After trial regimen, pts underwent imaging to determine residual radiographic disease per RECIST v1.1. A biopsy was performed if residual disease (RD) was suspected. Additional neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ANACT) was at discretion of the treating physician prior to definitive surgery. The primary objective was rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant SG/P. Secondary objectives included need for ANACT, radiographic response (RR), safety and tolerability (adverse events [AEs] per CTCAE v5.0) and event-free survival. A Simon two-stage design and standard descriptive statistics were utilized, including 95% binomial confidence intervals for all rates estimated. Results: From 5/19/23-8/13/24, 50 pts were enrolled (median age: 57 years, range 23-77). Clinical anatomic stage was II in 48 pts (96%) and III in 2 pts (4%). 64% of pts were node negative at diagnosis. 44 pts (88%) completed the trial regimen (5 pts had toxicity, 1 pt progressed on treatment). In interim analysis, 5/15 had pCR and so the remaining 35 were enrolled. The pCR rate per protocol (pts with pCR at surgery directly after SG/P without ANCT) was 16/50 (34%, 95% CI 19.5-46.7). The RR rate (complete CR or partial response PR) was 66% (95% CI 50-78%), 30% CR and 36% PR. Of 26 pts who received ANACT, 9 experienced pCR (2 biopsy-confirmed RD, 6 negative or non-diagnostic RD biopsy, 1 no biopsy). Overall, 25 (50%, 95% CI 35.5-64.5) pts had pCR at surgery. Of 5 pts with pathogenic BRCA mutations, 3 (60%) had pCR after SG/P, and 1 pt had pCR after ANACT. 20 pts (40%) had grade 3 or higher AEs. The most common AEs were nausea (28, 56%), alopecia (26, 52%), fatigue (23, 46%), and diarrhea (22, 44%). Dose reductions of SG occurred in 4 pts (8%). Updated survival and biomarker data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: In the first trial to investigate the SG/P combination in early TNBC, 34% of pts had pCR. Additional research is needed to determine the optimal duration and sequence of neoadjuvant SG/P and chemotherapy for pts with TNBC. Clinical trial information: NCT04230109 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Rachel Occhiogrosso Abelman
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Shannon McLaughlin
Geoffrey G. Fell
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Ana Christina Garrido-Castro
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Filipa Lynce
Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
Lorenzo Trippa
From Médecins Sans Frontières (L.G., F.V.), Sorbonne Université, INSERM Unité 1135, Centre d’Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses (L.G.), Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié–Salpêtrière, Centre National de Référence des Mycobactéries et de la Résistance des Mycobactéries aux Antituberculeux (L.G.), and Epicentre (M.G., E. Baudin), Paris, and Translational Research on HIV and Endemic and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Montpellier Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier (M.B.) — all in France; Interactive Development and Research, Singapore (U.K.); McGill University, Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, Montreal (U.K.); UCSF Center for Tuberculosis (G.E.V., P.N., P.P.J.P.) and the Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine (G.E.V.), University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco; the National Scientific Center of Phth...
Philip Daniel Poorvu
Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Aron S. Rosenstock
Massachusetts General Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Arielle J. Medford
Seth Andrew Wander
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Amy H. Comander
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
Steven J. Isakoff
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Beverly Moy
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Nadine M. Tung
Nadine M. Tung, MD, FASCO, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Tianyu Li, MS, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; and Judy E. Garber, MD, MPH, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Elizabeth A. Mittendorf
Leif Ellisen
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Sara M. Tolaney
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Aditya Bardia
Laura Spring
Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, MA