A phase 2 study of darolutamide plus leuprolide acetate in hormone therapy–naïve recurrent and/or metastatic androgen receptor (AR)–positive salivary gland cancer (ETCTN 10553).
Abstract
6012 Background: A subset of salivary gland cancers (SGCs) express the androgen receptor (AR). A prior AR+ SGC trial with the anti-androgen enzalutamide alone failed to meet its primary endpoint. This is a multicenter, phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the anti-androgen darolutamide (Bayer) in combination with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT; leuprolide acetate) in hormone-therapy naïve patients with AR+ SGCs. Methods: Patients with locally advanced/unresectable or recurrent/metastatic AR+ SGCs were enrolled. AR status was determined locally by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Prior AR-targeted therapy was not allowed, unless administered in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting >6 months before disease recurrence. Darolutamide 600 mg orally twice daily was given with leuprolide acetate intramuscular injections (1 cycle= 28 days). The primary endpoint was best overall response (BOR) rate according to RECIST v1.1 within 1 year of initiating treatment. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Exploratory endpoints were evaluating biomarkers in serially obtained research biopsies and exploring efficacy among patients who had not received prior systemic therapy. A two-stage minimax design was used to detect a 50% BOR rate (vs. 25%) (alpha = 9%; beta = 83%). ≥3 responses in the first 9 patients would trigger accrual to 20; ≥8 responses would be considered promising. Results: Study accrual of 20 patients (pts) with AR+ SGCs was completed on 10/30/25. 15 males, 5 females with a median age of 70.5 years were enrolled. Among the 9 pts in the first stage, 6 confirmed partial responses (PRs) were observed, allowing for full study accrual. With a data cutoff of 1/21/26, the best RECIST v1.1 responses among 20 pts were 8 (40% [19.1% 63.9%]) PRs (7 confirmed, 1 unconfirmed with pt still on treatment), 10 (50% [27.2%, 72.8%]) stable disease (SD), 1 (5% [1%, 24.9%]) progression of disease; 1 pt on treatment has not had radiographic assessments yet. 6 (30% [11.9%, 54.3%]) pts came off trial for disease progression, 1 (5% [1%, 24.9%]) withdrew consent after 6 cycles, and 13 (65%, [40.8%, 84.6%]) remain on treatment. Among 5 female pts, best responses were 1 (5% [1%, 24.9%]) PR, 3 (15% [3.2%, 37.9%]) SD, 1 (5% [1%, 24.9%]) PD. With additional follow-up, PFS, OS, and biomarker data (AR IHC %, HER2 status) will be presented. Conclusions: In this molecularly selected cohort of patients with SGC, darolutamide plus ADT possesses significant clinical activity, validating AR as a relevant therapeutic target in a subset of SGCs. Analysis of serial research biopsies will be performed to identify biomarker and/or drug combination strategies to enhance the efficacy of AR-targeting. Clinical trial information: NCT05669664 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (13)
Alan Loh Ho
Solid Tumor Oncology Division, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Varinder Kaur
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
Shetal Arvind Patel
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Renata Ferrarotto
Daniel W. Bowles
University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
Zujun Li
NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
Ruizhe Chen
Frontiers Science Center for Flexible Electronics, and Xi’an Institute of Flexible Electronics (IFE)
Judy Murray
Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
Alexander T. Pearson
Shirin Attarian
UCI Health Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, CA
Dan Paul Zandberg
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Kathleen Claire Kerrigan
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
Michael A. Carducci
Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD