A phase 2 study of darolutamide plus leuprolide acetate in hormone therapy–naïve recurrent and/or metastatic androgen receptor (AR)–positive salivary gland cancer (ETCTN 10553).

A Alan Loh Ho (Solid Tumor Oncology Division, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) V Varinder Kaur (University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA) S Shetal Arvind Patel (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC) R Renata Ferrarotto D Daniel W. Bowles (University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO) Z Zujun Li (NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY) R Ruizhe Chen (Frontiers Science Center for Flexible Electronics, and Xi’an Institute of Flexible Electronics (IFE)) J Judy Murray (Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD) A Alexander T. Pearson S Shirin Attarian (UCI Health Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, CA) D Dan Paul Zandberg (UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) K Kathleen Claire Kerrigan (University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT) M Michael A. Carducci (Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD)

Abstract

6012 Background: A subset of salivary gland cancers (SGCs) express the androgen receptor (AR). A prior AR+ SGC trial with the anti-androgen enzalutamide alone failed to meet its primary endpoint. This is a multicenter, phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the anti-androgen darolutamide (Bayer) in combination with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT; leuprolide acetate) in hormone-therapy naïve patients with AR+ SGCs. Methods: Patients with locally advanced/unresectable or recurrent/metastatic AR+ SGCs were enrolled. AR status was determined locally by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Prior AR-targeted therapy was not allowed, unless administered in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting >6 months before disease recurrence. Darolutamide 600 mg orally twice daily was given with leuprolide acetate intramuscular injections (1 cycle= 28 days). The primary endpoint was best overall response (BOR) rate according to RECIST v1.1 within 1 year of initiating treatment. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Exploratory endpoints were evaluating biomarkers in serially obtained research biopsies and exploring efficacy among patients who had not received prior systemic therapy. A two-stage minimax design was used to detect a 50% BOR rate (vs. 25%) (alpha = 9%; beta = 83%). ≥3 responses in the first 9 patients would trigger accrual to 20; ≥8 responses would be considered promising. Results: Study accrual of 20 patients (pts) with AR+ SGCs was completed on 10/30/25. 15 males, 5 females with a median age of 70.5 years were enrolled. Among the 9 pts in the first stage, 6 confirmed partial responses (PRs) were observed, allowing for full study accrual. With a data cutoff of 1/21/26, the best RECIST v1.1 responses among 20 pts were 8 (40% [19.1% 63.9%]) PRs (7 confirmed, 1 unconfirmed with pt still on treatment), 10 (50% [27.2%, 72.8%]) stable disease (SD), 1 (5% [1%, 24.9%]) progression of disease; 1 pt on treatment has not had radiographic assessments yet. 6 (30% [11.9%, 54.3%]) pts came off trial for disease progression, 1 (5% [1%, 24.9%]) withdrew consent after 6 cycles, and 13 (65%, [40.8%, 84.6%]) remain on treatment. Among 5 female pts, best responses were 1 (5% [1%, 24.9%]) PR, 3 (15% [3.2%, 37.9%]) SD, 1 (5% [1%, 24.9%]) PD. With additional follow-up, PFS, OS, and biomarker data (AR IHC %, HER2 status) will be presented. Conclusions: In this molecularly selected cohort of patients with SGC, darolutamide plus ADT possesses significant clinical activity, validating AR as a relevant therapeutic target in a subset of SGCs. Analysis of serial research biopsies will be performed to identify biomarker and/or drug combination strategies to enhance the efficacy of AR-targeting. Clinical trial information: NCT05669664 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 6012-6012
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (13)

A

Alan Loh Ho

Solid Tumor Oncology Division, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

V

Varinder Kaur

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA

S

Shetal Arvind Patel

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

R

Renata Ferrarotto

D

Daniel W. Bowles

University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO

Z

Zujun Li

NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY

R

Ruizhe Chen

Frontiers Science Center for Flexible Electronics, and Xi’an Institute of Flexible Electronics (IFE)

J

Judy Murray

Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD

A

Alexander T. Pearson

S

Shirin Attarian

UCI Health Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, CA

D

Dan Paul Zandberg

UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

K

Kathleen Claire Kerrigan

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

M

Michael A. Carducci

Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD