A phase 2 study of cabozantinib in combination with atezolizumab as neoadjuvant treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, (HCRN GU18-343) ABATE study.
Abstract
800 Background: Atezolizumab (A) has demonstrated single agent activity as neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) (ABACUS trial). Cabozantinib (C) has a unique immunomodulatory profile that may foster anti-tumor immunity and has demonstrated clinical activity as monotherapy and in combination with A. We hypothesized that the combination of C and A as NAT for MIUC would improve pathologic response rate (pRR) compared to single-agent A. Methods: This open-label, single arm, multi-center study investigated the efficacy and safety of C 40 mg PO daily with A 1200mg every 3 weeks for 9 weeks as NAT for cT2-T4aN0/xM0 MIUC. Eligibility required patients (pts) to be cisplatin-ineligible or decline cisplatin, with UC as the predominant histology (≥ 50%). Primary endpoint was pRR defined as no residual muscle-invasive cancer in the surgical specimen (< ypT2); patients with progression prior to cystectomy were counted as non-responders. pRR was to be compared to the 39% response rate with the single agent A using a Bayesian evaluation with a Beta (0.5, 0.5) prior. Secondary endpoints were safety and toxicity, pathologic complete response rate (pCR, ypT0N0M0) and event-free survival (EFS). Exploratory end points included patient-reported outcomes and outcome associations with biomarkers. Results: From Feb 2021 to July 2024, 46 pts enrolled at 5 sites. 2 pts were deemed ineligible, and 6 pts did not proceed with cystectomy for reasons other than progression (4 pts opted for bladder preservation, 1 pt died from causes unrelated to tx and 1 pt still undergoing tx). Median follow up is 14 mo. At study entry median age was 71 yrs, 21% were female, 98% Caucasian and 71% were cisplatin ineligible, with T2, T3 and T4 disease in 73%, 18% and 9% respectively. Histology included pure urothelial cancer (56%), squamous (18%), glandular (3%), micropapillary (18%) and plasmacytoid (5%) differentiation. Among 35 pts who underwent cystectomy, 32 (91%) / 3 (9%) completed 3 and 2 doses of A and 15 (43%) / 32 (91%) completed 9 and at least 6 weeks of C. Adverse events are being analyzed. The estimated pRR was 29.5% (95% CrI 16.5% - 44.5%) and the pCR was 20.8% (95% CrI 9.4% - 35.3%). The pCR was lower in pts with variant histology compared to pure UC (13 vs 25%; p=0.39). 2-year EFS was 68.4% (95% CI, 47.7-82.3%). Conclusions: C+A has modest activity as NAT in MIUC and did not meet the pre-specified primary endpoint for pRR. Biomarkers studies are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT04289779 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (16)
Deepak Kilari
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Anikó Szabó
Kathryn Bylow
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Ariel Ann Nelson
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Peter Langenstroer
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Scott Johnson
BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CTR, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Arjun Sivaraman
MCW, Milwaukee, WI
Kenneth Jacobsohn
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Chunkit Fung
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
Sindhuja G Kadambi
James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
Brian I. Rini
Melissa A Reimers
Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
Robert S. Alter
Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ
Asit KR Paul
VCU Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center, Richmond, VA
Brendan John Guercio
James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
Matthew I. Milowsky