A phase 2 double-blind, randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled study of NanO₂ combined with radiation and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: RESTORE.

S Samuel A. Goldlust (Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO) M Michael A. Badruddoja (Northwest Medcl Plz Center for Neurosciences, Tucson, AZ) N Nicholas Alfred Blondin (Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT) K Katherine B. Peters N Naveed Wagle (Saint John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA) B Baldassarre Stea (University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ) H Herbert B. Newton (University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center & Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH) A Adam Louis Cohen (Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA) C Caroline Goldin (Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans, LA) X Xiao-Tang Kong (UCI Health, Orange, CA) R Robert Aiken (Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ) A Andrew Tsung (Saint Francis Medical Center, Peoria, IL) D Daruka Mahadevan (1University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, United States) C Claire Huang (NuvOx Therapeutics, Tuscon, AZ) E Evan C. Unger (NuvOx Therapeutics, Tucson, AZ)

Abstract

2065 Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) contains extensive hypoxic regions due to tumor-associated thrombosis and abnormal vasculature. Hypoxia drives resistance to radiation (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) by limiting oxygen-dependent DNA damage, enabling DNA repair, and reducing drug efficacy and delivery. The RESTORE trial (NCT03862430) is the first randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled study of NanO₂ (2% w/v dodecafluoropentane emulsion) in GBM, a fluorocarbon-based oxygen therapeutic hypothesized to reoxygenate hypoxic GBM tissue, with the goal of enhancing the efficacy of chemoradiation. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed GBM (WHO 2021) received standard-of-care radiation (60 Gy) with concurrent TMZ (75 mg/m²/day). Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either NanO 2 or 0.9% sodium chloride administered intravenously immediately prior to each RT fraction, with continuous supplemental oxygen given during the infusion and RT. Following chemoradiation, patients completed a four-week recovery period before initiating adjuvant TMZ for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint is progression free survival and secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, pseudoprogression rate, and patient reported outcomes. Results: Between May 2023 and October 2025, 93 patients were treated (safety set). The study has completed the planned enrollment. Median age was 63 years (range, 19–84) and 57% were men. As of the data cutoff on 12/29/25, all patients completed the follow up visit 4 weeks after chemoradiation. Sixty-eight patients (73%) remained on study undergoing adjuvant TMZ or in long-term follow-up. Twenty-one patients passed of tumor progression and 4 patients withdrew consent. The median duration on study was 8.7 months (range, 1.3–31.4). During chemoradiation and the four-week recovery, 63 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of CTCAE severity grade ≥3 were reported in 37% of patients, with brain edema, lymphocyte count decreased, and platelet count decreased being the most frequently reported. Twenty-six treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) occurred in 19% of patients, with embolism, pulmonary embolism, and seizure being the most frequently reported. Three TESAEs were assessed as possibly or probably related to study drug; none were unexpected. Survival follow up is ongoing. Conclusions: In this blinded, pooled safety analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial in newly diagnosed GBM, the study treatment was well tolerated and no new safety signals were identified. Treatment allocation remains blinded. Efficacy outcomes and arm-specific safety analyses will be reported after completion of the primary endpoint analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT03862430 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 2065-2065
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

S

Samuel A. Goldlust

Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO

M

Michael A. Badruddoja

Northwest Medcl Plz Center for Neurosciences, Tucson, AZ

N

Nicholas Alfred Blondin

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

K

Katherine B. Peters

N

Naveed Wagle

Saint John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA

B

Baldassarre Stea

University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ

H

Herbert B. Newton

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center & Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH

A

Adam Louis Cohen

Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA

C

Caroline Goldin

Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans, LA

X

Xiao-Tang Kong

UCI Health, Orange, CA

R

Robert Aiken

Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ

A

Andrew Tsung

Saint Francis Medical Center, Peoria, IL

D

Daruka Mahadevan

1University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, United States

C

Claire Huang

NuvOx Therapeutics, Tuscon, AZ

E

Evan C. Unger

NuvOx Therapeutics, Tucson, AZ