A phase 2 double-blind, randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled study of NanO₂ combined with radiation and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: RESTORE.
Abstract
2065 Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) contains extensive hypoxic regions due to tumor-associated thrombosis and abnormal vasculature. Hypoxia drives resistance to radiation (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) by limiting oxygen-dependent DNA damage, enabling DNA repair, and reducing drug efficacy and delivery. The RESTORE trial (NCT03862430) is the first randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled study of NanO₂ (2% w/v dodecafluoropentane emulsion) in GBM, a fluorocarbon-based oxygen therapeutic hypothesized to reoxygenate hypoxic GBM tissue, with the goal of enhancing the efficacy of chemoradiation. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed GBM (WHO 2021) received standard-of-care radiation (60 Gy) with concurrent TMZ (75 mg/m²/day). Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either NanO 2 or 0.9% sodium chloride administered intravenously immediately prior to each RT fraction, with continuous supplemental oxygen given during the infusion and RT. Following chemoradiation, patients completed a four-week recovery period before initiating adjuvant TMZ for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint is progression free survival and secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, pseudoprogression rate, and patient reported outcomes. Results: Between May 2023 and October 2025, 93 patients were treated (safety set). The study has completed the planned enrollment. Median age was 63 years (range, 19–84) and 57% were men. As of the data cutoff on 12/29/25, all patients completed the follow up visit 4 weeks after chemoradiation. Sixty-eight patients (73%) remained on study undergoing adjuvant TMZ or in long-term follow-up. Twenty-one patients passed of tumor progression and 4 patients withdrew consent. The median duration on study was 8.7 months (range, 1.3–31.4). During chemoradiation and the four-week recovery, 63 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of CTCAE severity grade ≥3 were reported in 37% of patients, with brain edema, lymphocyte count decreased, and platelet count decreased being the most frequently reported. Twenty-six treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) occurred in 19% of patients, with embolism, pulmonary embolism, and seizure being the most frequently reported. Three TESAEs were assessed as possibly or probably related to study drug; none were unexpected. Survival follow up is ongoing. Conclusions: In this blinded, pooled safety analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial in newly diagnosed GBM, the study treatment was well tolerated and no new safety signals were identified. Treatment allocation remains blinded. Efficacy outcomes and arm-specific safety analyses will be reported after completion of the primary endpoint analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT03862430 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (15)
Samuel A. Goldlust
Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO
Michael A. Badruddoja
Northwest Medcl Plz Center for Neurosciences, Tucson, AZ
Nicholas Alfred Blondin
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
Katherine B. Peters
Naveed Wagle
Saint John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA
Baldassarre Stea
University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ
Herbert B. Newton
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center & Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH
Adam Louis Cohen
Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA
Caroline Goldin
Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans, LA
Xiao-Tang Kong
UCI Health, Orange, CA
Robert Aiken
Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ
Andrew Tsung
Saint Francis Medical Center, Peoria, IL
Daruka Mahadevan
1University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
Claire Huang
NuvOx Therapeutics, Tuscon, AZ
Evan C. Unger
NuvOx Therapeutics, Tucson, AZ