A phase 2 dose expansion study of ZG006, a trispecific T cell engager targeting CD3/DLL3/DLL3, as monotherapy in patients with advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma.

J Jianming Xu (State Key Laboratory of Soil Pollution Control and Safety,) H Hanguang Hu (Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China) M Ming Lu C Chenyu Mao (Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine) W Wei Wang J Jianwei Yang (Frontiers Science Center for High Energy Material, Advanced Technology Research Institute (Jinan), Key Laboratory of Cluster Science, Ministry of Education, Beijing Key Laboratory of Photoelectronic/Electrophotonic Conversion Materials, School of Interdisciplinary Science, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering) F Fei Yin Y Yanqiao Zhang X Xiaoyan Lin Y Yanjun Mi (Oncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China) X Xinjun Liang (11Hubei Cancer Hospital, Hubei Cancer Research Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Wuhan, China) Z Zhihu Li (Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, China) J Jingdong Zhang K Kangsheng Gu (The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China) Y Ying Liu J Jason Jisheng Wu (Suzhou Zelgen Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China)

Abstract

e16341 Background: ZG006 is a trispecific T cell engager (Tri-TE) targeting Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) and CD3, designed to bridge tumor cells and T cells by binding to two distinct DLL3 epitopes on tumor cells and CD3 on T cells, thereby mediating T cell-specific killing of DLL3-expressing tumor cells such as small cell lung cancer and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Here, we report the preliminary results from the ongoing phase 2 study of ZG006 in patients (pts) with advanced NEC. Methods: This is a randomization, multi-center, open-label phase 2 study of ZG006 as monotherapy in NEC pts failed to at least 1 prior lines of standard systemic treatment. Based on ZG006 phase 1 study results, both 10 mg and 30 mg Q2W doses with a priming dose of 1 mg are being evaluated in this phase 2 dose optimization study. Planned to have 60 pts be randomized at 1:1 ratio to receive one of the two ZG006 doses. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST1.1. The DLL3 expression is not required for the study entry but will be retrospectively evaluated by a central lab. Results: As of Dec. 31, 2024, a total of 17 NEC pts were randomized (8 on 10 mg, 9 on 30 mg) and received≥1 dose of ZG006; Pts included 7 males and 10 females, with median age 54.0 years (range: 30-71). All pts had received ≥1 line of prior treatment, and the majority (76.5%) received ≥2 lines. 58.8% (10/17) had received a prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment. The primary tumor sites included colorectum (4/17), cervix (4/17), esophagus (3/17), stomach (2/17), gallbladder (2/17), liver (1/17) and appendix (1/17). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 15 pts (88.2%); most commonly (≥20%): pyrexia (70.6%), cytokine release syndrome (58.3%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (35.3%), anemia (29.4%), asthenia (29.4%) and alanine aminotransferase increased (23.5%). Four pts (23.5%) experienced six grade 3/4 TRAEs (1 each of neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, asthenia, hypertension, hypokalemia and metabolic acidosis), and no pts experienced TRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation or death. Two pts (11.8%) experienced treatment-related serious adverse events. No significant difference was observed in the safety profile between the two dose groups. Three pts (1 on 10 mg, 2 on 30 mg) were efficacy-evaluable with at least one post-baseline tumor assessment. Of them, one patient with cervical neuroendocrine carcinoma on 30 mg achieved confirmed partial response and one patient with colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma on 10 mg was stable disease. Overall, the ORR was 33.3% and the DCR was 66.7%. DoR and PFS have not matured. Conclusions: With a limited data, ZG006 exhibited an anti-tumor activity trend in NEC pts who failed to prior standard treatments. The safety profiles were generally similar to those observed in the ZG006 Phase 1 dose escalation study. Clinical trial information: NCT06440057 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

J

Jianming Xu

State Key Laboratory of Soil Pollution Control and Safety,

H

Hanguang Hu

Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China

M

Ming Lu

C

Chenyu Mao

Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine

W

Wei Wang

J

Jianwei Yang

Frontiers Science Center for High Energy Material, Advanced Technology Research Institute (Jinan), Key Laboratory of Cluster Science, Ministry of Education, Beijing Key Laboratory of Photoelectronic/Electrophotonic Conversion Materials, School of Interdisciplinary Science, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

F

Fei Yin

Y

Yanqiao Zhang

X

Xiaoyan Lin

Y

Yanjun Mi

Oncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

X

Xinjun Liang

11Hubei Cancer Hospital, Hubei Cancer Research Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Wuhan, China

Z

Zhihu Li

Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, China

J

Jingdong Zhang

K

Kangsheng Gu

The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China

Y

Ying Liu

J

Jason Jisheng Wu

Suzhou Zelgen Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China