A phase 1b study of SYS6002 in advanced solid tumors.
Abstract
4579 Background: SYS6002 is a next-generation Nectin-4-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) utilizing a novel site-specific enzymatic conjugation technology to link monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) with a uniform drug-antibody ratio of 2. This design aims to enhance linker stability, minimize free payload release, and improve the therapeutic window. Methods: This phase 1 study (ChiCTR2200066256) included dose escalation (0.2–4.5 mg/kg Q3W; 2.4–2.7 mg/kg Q2W), pharmacokinetic (PK) expansion, and cohort expansion phases. Eligible patients had advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapies. The primary endpoints were safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints included PK profile and efficacy, with the latter reported herein were specific to the pretreated advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) cohort. Results: As of Dec 19, 2025, 150 patients were enrolled (dose escalation n=32; PK expansion n=70; cohort expansion n=48). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached up to 4.5 mg/kg. The RP2D in aUC patients was determined as 3.6 mg/kg Q3W. SYS6002 exhibited a manageable safety profile in all 150 patients. With a median follow-up of 11.5 months (IQR 6.5-15.5), 2 (1.3%) patients discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and no TRAE led to death. The most common TRAEs were ocular disorders (e.g., corneal disorder, dry eye), which were predominantly Grade 1-2. While ocular events were frequent (consistent with on-target effects), they were reversible and effectively managed with prophylaxis, resulting in no treatment discontinuations due to ocular toxicity. Notably, TRAEs typically associated with payload shedding were characterized by low incidence, with peripheral neuropathy reported in 11.3% of patients (no Grade ≥3) and rash in 20.7% (2.0% Grade ≥3), which compared favorably to historical data of other MMAE-based ADCs. Furthermore, no Stevens-Johnson Syndrome or Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis reported. In 85 efficacy-evaluable aUC patients across all tested doses, the objective response rate (ORR) was 37.6% (95%CI 27.4-48.8) and disease control rate (DCR) was 77.6% (95%CI 67.3-86.0), with a median duration of response of 6.2 months (95%CI 4.3-10.4) and median overall survival of 13.2 months (95%CI 10.6-14.9). At the RP2D (n=39), the ORR reached 41.0% (95%CI 25.6-57.9). Encouragingly, in heavily pretreated patients with prior MMAE-based ADC exposure (n=25), SYS6002 maintained activity with an ORR of 24.0% (95%CI 9.4-45.1) and DCR of 72.0% (95%CI 50.6-87.9), suggesting potential to overcome resistance. Conclusions: SYS6002 demonstrated a distinct safety profile from other Nectin-4 ADCs. Its promising efficacy in aUC patients, extending to those progressing on prior MMAE-based ADCs, supports further phase 3 trials. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2200066256.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Yao Zhu
Dingwei Ye
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai
Jian Zhang
Shanshan Wang
College of Integrated Circuits and Micro-Nano Electronics
Xin Yao
Qiang Lv
Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon-Based Functional Materials & Devices, Soochow University, 199 Ren’ai Road, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, P. R. China
Yuping Sun
Key Laboratory of Materials Physics, Institute of Solid State Physics, HFIPS
Tongsen Zheng
Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
Ming Liu
Guiling Li
Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China
Wei Li
Funan Liu
Jinsheng Shi
Qingdao Key Lab of Common Diseases Qingdao Municipal Hospital University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Qingdao Shandong 266000 China
Xin An
Key Laboratory of Entomology and Pest Control Engineering, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University
Yongmei Yin
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug Research, College of Pharmacy
Jing Yuan
Ying Chen
Pan Shu
Jingyi Zhang
Chemistry and Biomedicine Innovation Center (ChemBIC), State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, School of Chemistry
Jihao Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Precision and Intelligent Chemistry, Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Materials Science