A phase 1b study of SYS6002 in advanced solid tumors.

Y Yao Zhu D Dingwei Ye (Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai) J Jian Zhang S Shanshan Wang (College of Integrated Circuits and Micro-Nano Electronics) X Xin Yao Q Qiang Lv (Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon-Based Functional Materials & Devices, Soochow University, 199 Ren’ai Road, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, P. R. China) Y Yuping Sun (Key Laboratory of Materials Physics, Institute of Solid State Physics, HFIPS) T Tongsen Zheng (Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China) M Ming Liu G Guiling Li (Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China) W Wei Li F Funan Liu J Jinsheng Shi (Qingdao Key Lab of Common Diseases Qingdao Municipal Hospital University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Qingdao Shandong 266000 China) X Xin An (Key Laboratory of Entomology and Pest Control Engineering, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University) Y Yongmei Yin (Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug Research, College of Pharmacy) J Jing Yuan Y Ying Chen P Pan Shu J Jingyi Zhang (Chemistry and Biomedicine Innovation Center (ChemBIC), State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, School of Chemistry) J Jihao Zhang (State Key Laboratory of Precision and Intelligent Chemistry, Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Materials Science)

Abstract

4579 Background: SYS6002 is a next-generation Nectin-4-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) utilizing a novel site-specific enzymatic conjugation technology to link monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) with a uniform drug-antibody ratio of 2. This design aims to enhance linker stability, minimize free payload release, and improve the therapeutic window. Methods: This phase 1 study (ChiCTR2200066256) included dose escalation (0.2–4.5 mg/kg Q3W; 2.4–2.7 mg/kg Q2W), pharmacokinetic (PK) expansion, and cohort expansion phases. Eligible patients had advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapies. The primary endpoints were safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints included PK profile and efficacy, with the latter reported herein were specific to the pretreated advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) cohort. Results: As of Dec 19, 2025, 150 patients were enrolled (dose escalation n=32; PK expansion n=70; cohort expansion n=48). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached up to 4.5 mg/kg. The RP2D in aUC patients was determined as 3.6 mg/kg Q3W. SYS6002 exhibited a manageable safety profile in all 150 patients. With a median follow-up of 11.5 months (IQR 6.5-15.5), 2 (1.3%) patients discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and no TRAE led to death. The most common TRAEs were ocular disorders (e.g., corneal disorder, dry eye), which were predominantly Grade 1-2. While ocular events were frequent (consistent with on-target effects), they were reversible and effectively managed with prophylaxis, resulting in no treatment discontinuations due to ocular toxicity. Notably, TRAEs typically associated with payload shedding were characterized by low incidence, with peripheral neuropathy reported in 11.3% of patients (no Grade ≥3) and rash in 20.7% (2.0% Grade ≥3), which compared favorably to historical data of other MMAE-based ADCs. Furthermore, no Stevens-Johnson Syndrome or Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis reported. In 85 efficacy-evaluable aUC patients across all tested doses, the objective response rate (ORR) was 37.6% (95%CI 27.4-48.8) and disease control rate (DCR) was 77.6% (95%CI 67.3-86.0), with a median duration of response of 6.2 months (95%CI 4.3-10.4) and median overall survival of 13.2 months (95%CI 10.6-14.9). At the RP2D (n=39), the ORR reached 41.0% (95%CI 25.6-57.9). Encouragingly, in heavily pretreated patients with prior MMAE-based ADC exposure (n=25), SYS6002 maintained activity with an ORR of 24.0% (95%CI 9.4-45.1) and DCR of 72.0% (95%CI 50.6-87.9), suggesting potential to overcome resistance. Conclusions: SYS6002 demonstrated a distinct safety profile from other Nectin-4 ADCs. Its promising efficacy in aUC patients, extending to those progressing on prior MMAE-based ADCs, supports further phase 3 trials. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2200066256.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 4579-4579
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

Y

Yao Zhu

D

Dingwei Ye

Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai

J

Jian Zhang

S

Shanshan Wang

College of Integrated Circuits and Micro-Nano Electronics

X

Xin Yao

Q

Qiang Lv

Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon-Based Functional Materials & Devices, Soochow University, 199 Ren’ai Road, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, P. R. China

Y

Yuping Sun

Key Laboratory of Materials Physics, Institute of Solid State Physics, HFIPS

T

Tongsen Zheng

Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China

M

Ming Liu

G

Guiling Li

Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China

W

Wei Li

F

Funan Liu

J

Jinsheng Shi

Qingdao Key Lab of Common Diseases Qingdao Municipal Hospital University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Qingdao Shandong 266000 China

X

Xin An

Key Laboratory of Entomology and Pest Control Engineering, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University

Y

Yongmei Yin

Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Drug Research, College of Pharmacy

J

Jing Yuan

Y

Ying Chen

P

Pan Shu

J

Jingyi Zhang

Chemistry and Biomedicine Innovation Center (ChemBIC), State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, School of Chemistry

J

Jihao Zhang

State Key Laboratory of Precision and Intelligent Chemistry, Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Materials Science