A multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label trial to determine the optimal duration of steroid therapy for mild pneumonitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

D Daichi Fujimoto (Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan) M Mitsuhiro Abe (Chiba University, Chiba, Japan) K Kenta Murotani Y Yuki Sato T Takashi Kijima (Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan) M Motohiro Tamiya (Department of Thoracic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan) Y Yoshihiko Taniguchi (NHO Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, Osaka, Japan) H Hidekazu Suzuki E Eisaku Miyauchi Y Yoshihiko Sakata (Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto-Shi Minami-Ku, Japan) S Satoru Miura E Eri Takase (NHO Minami Wakayama Medical Center, Tanabe, NA, Japan) D Daisuke Arai A Ayumu Otsuki (Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan) T Teppei Yamaguchi (Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan) J Jun Sugisaka H Hiroshi Yokouchi (National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan) H Hisashi Tanaka N Nobuyuki Yamamoto (Department of Chemistry) H Hiroaki Akamatsu

Abstract

12006 Background: The optimal duration of corticosteroid therapy for pneumonitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors is clinically relevant. Several guidelines recommend a duration of 4 to 6 weeks for mild immune-related pneumonitis. However, evidence from clinical trials is limited. We conducted the first randomized trial to evaluate whether short-term corticosteroid therapy can achieve comparable efficacy. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial at 22 institutions in Japan, we randomly assigned patients with mild immune-related pneumonitis according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 1 or 2, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive either 3-week or 6-week corticosteroid treatment. The primary endpoint was the rate of treatment success 8 weeks after the start of steroid administration, with a non-inferiority margin of 16 percentage points. The major secondary endpoints were safety, percentage of participants with treatment failure, quality of life, and overall survival. The primary hypothesis was that a 3-week treatment would be non-inferior to a 6-week treatment in terms of the primary endpoint. Results: Overall, 106 patients were randomized, and after the exclusion of one patient without immune-related pneumonitis, 105 were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population: 51 patients in the 3-week group and 54 in the 6-week group. In the ITT population, the patients’ median age was 72 years; 81% of the patients were men, and 73% had grade 2 at baseline. The rate of treatment success was 66.7% in the 3-week group and 85.2% in the 6-week group, which did not demonstrate noninferiority in the overall study population (difference, −18.5% percentage points [80% confidence interval {CI}, −29.0% to -7.9%], p = 0.621), and a predefined exploratory superiority analysis indicated superiority of the 6-week regimen (p = 0.013). Over the entire study period, the relapse or exacerbation rates of pneumonitis were 41.1% in the 3-week group and 24.1% in the 6-week group. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 12% of patients in the 3-week group and 24% of patients in the 6-week group. The absolute mean change in the total QOL using the K-BILD score from baseline was 4.78 in the 3-week group and 6.28 in the 6-week group (between-group difference, -1.50 points; 95% CI, −5.91 to 2.91). Conclusions: In patients with mild immune-related pneumonitis, non-inferiority of 3-week corticosteroid treatment compared to that of 6 weeks was not confirmed in the overall population, and the relapse or exacerbation rate of pneumonitis was higher in the 3-week group over the entire study period. Corticosteroid therapy shorter than the duration recommended by the guidelines is not supported. Clinical trial information: jRCTs051220082 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 12006-12006
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

D

Daichi Fujimoto

Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan

M

Mitsuhiro Abe

Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

K

Kenta Murotani

Y

Yuki Sato

T

Takashi Kijima

Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan

M

Motohiro Tamiya

Department of Thoracic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan

Y

Yoshihiko Taniguchi

NHO Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, Osaka, Japan

H

Hidekazu Suzuki

E

Eisaku Miyauchi

Y

Yoshihiko Sakata

Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto-Shi Minami-Ku, Japan

S

Satoru Miura

E

Eri Takase

NHO Minami Wakayama Medical Center, Tanabe, NA, Japan

D

Daisuke Arai

A

Ayumu Otsuki

Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan

T

Teppei Yamaguchi

Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan

J

Jun Sugisaka

H

Hiroshi Yokouchi

National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan

H

Hisashi Tanaka

N

Nobuyuki Yamamoto

Department of Chemistry

H

Hiroaki Akamatsu