A meta-analysis of induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: The role of ICT type and duration on efficacy outcomes.

M Matheus de Oliveira Andrade (Américas Oncologia - Hospital Brasília, Brasília, Brazil) O Otavio de Carvalho Modaffar Al Alam (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD) H Henrique Jin Son Kim (A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil) J João Pedro Batista (MetroWest Medical Center, Framingham, MA) D Débora Dornellas (Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil) R Ricardo Lima Coelho (Centro Paulista de Oncologia (CPO) - Oncoclinicas & Co, São Paulo, Brazil and Hospital Adventista de Manaus, Manaus, Brazil) V Vitória Borges (DASA Ginecologia, Alta Diagnósticos, São Paulo, Brazil) M Mariana Carvalho Gouveia (Hospital 9 de Julho, Americas Oncologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil) M Mariana Scaranti (DASA Oncologia, Hospital 9 de Julho, São Paulo, Brazil) R Renata Colombo Bonadio (Instituto D’Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil) S Stephanie Gaillard (Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD) S Samantha Costa (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil)

Abstract

5539 Background: The treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is based on concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CCRT). While the recent incorporation of pembrolizumab for stage III-IVA disease has expanded treatment options, immunotherapy remains inaccessible in many regions with high cervical cancer prevalence. The addition of induction chemotherapy (ICT) prior to CCRT is controversial, as trials have yielded conflicting results. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the type and duration of the ICT for LACC. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane for studies with patients diagnosed with LACC receiving ICT followed by CCRT. Studies that included surgery, definitive radiotherapy (without concurrent chemotherapy), or immunotherapy were excluded. We compared ICT regimens between each other based on drug type and duration, and conducted a meta-analysis of trials comparing ICT followed by CRT versus CRT alone. Meta-analyses were carried out using random-effects model, with heterogeneity assessed via I² statistics and Cochran’s Q test. Sensitivity analyses were performed using the leave-one-out approach, and meta-analyses of proportions with subgroup analyses. Results: Among 5,282 screened studies, 20 met the inclusion criteria, representing 1,543 patients treated with ICT. Meta-analysis of proportions revealed a 2-year overall survival (OS) of 84.1% for studies utilizing platinum–paclitaxel compared to 72.2% for platinum–gemcitabine (p-value for subgroup difference = 0.022). Studies with ICT duration of ≤6 weeks showed a 2-year OS of 84.8% compared to 71.7% for ICT duration >6 weeks (p = 0.003). Other subgroup comparisons (cisplatin versus carboplatin, cycle duration of ≤14 days versus >14 days, and cisplatin dose intensity <25 mg/m²/week versus ≥25 mg/m²/week) did not show statistically significant differences in 2-year OS. A meta-analysis of the five controlled studies exhibited high heterogeneity in OS and progression-free survival (PFS), driven by the CIRCE trial — the only study employing a platinum–gemcitabine ICT regimen lasting >6 weeks. Sensitivity analysis excluding this trial demonstrated a significant improvement in OS (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.47–0.99; p = 0.049) and PFS (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.31–0.69; p = 0.0002) with the addition of ICT to CCRT, compared to CCRT alone. Conclusions: In patients with LACC, the addition of ICT to CCRT significantly improves PFS and OS compared to CCRT alone, provided that the ICT involves a platinum doublet with paclitaxel and is administered within ≤6 weeks.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 5539-5539
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

M

Matheus de Oliveira Andrade

Américas Oncologia - Hospital Brasília, Brasília, Brazil

O

Otavio de Carvalho Modaffar Al Alam

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

H

Henrique Jin Son Kim

A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil

J

João Pedro Batista

MetroWest Medical Center, Framingham, MA

D

Débora Dornellas

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil

R

Ricardo Lima Coelho

Centro Paulista de Oncologia (CPO) - Oncoclinicas & Co, São Paulo, Brazil and Hospital Adventista de Manaus, Manaus, Brazil

V

Vitória Borges

DASA Ginecologia, Alta Diagnósticos, São Paulo, Brazil

M

Mariana Carvalho Gouveia

Hospital 9 de Julho, Americas Oncologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil

M

Mariana Scaranti

DASA Oncologia, Hospital 9 de Julho, São Paulo, Brazil

R

Renata Colombo Bonadio

Instituto D’Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil

S

Stephanie Gaillard

Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD

S

Samantha Costa

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil