A double-blind placebo controlled randomized phase III trial of fulvestrant and ipatasertib as treatment for advanced HER2-negative and estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer following progression on first line CDK 4/6 inhibitor and aromatase inhibitor: The CCTG/BCT MA.40/FINER study (NCT04650581).
Abstract
LBA1005 Background: Standard first line therapy in ER+/ HER2 negative endocrine sensitive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus AI. Upon progression the majority of patients will receive further endocrine based therapy. Alterations in PI3K/AKT pathway genes are a known mechanism of endocrine resistance – either de novo or acquired. The MA.40 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of the AKT inhibitor ipatasertib versus placebo plus fulvestrant in the metastatic breast cancer (MBC) setting immediately post progression on 1 st line CDK4/6 inhibitor and AI. Methods: This phase III, randomized, double-blind trial enrolled pre/peri/postmenopausal women and men with ER+/HER-2 negative MBC. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ipatasertib plus fulvestrant versus (vs) placebo plus fulvestrant. Stratification factors included: AKT pathway altered ( PIK3CA , AKT1 , and/or PTEN genomic alteration(s)) vs wild-type/unknown and endocrine resistance (primary vs secondary). Primary objective: To compare investigator assessed PFS (RECIST 1.1) between treatment arms in the ITT population. Pre-specified secondary analysis: PFS in the AKT pathway altered cohort using a hierarchical procedure. The FoundationOne Liquid cfDNA NGS assay was utilized to assess genomic alterations in the AKT pathway for stratification. Results: 250 participants (females 247/males 3) were enrolled from Canada, Australia and New Zealand between January 2021 and May 2024. Baseline characteristics between arms were balanced. 44.4% of the study population had AKT pathway alteration(s) per cfDNA assay. Median follow-up 15.2 months(mo); proportion remaining on protocol treatment at time of analysis 21.0% ipatasertib vs 11.3% placebo arm. Median PFS ITT ipatasertib vs placebo arms were: 5.32 mo (95% CI: 3.58 to 5.62 mo) vs 1.94 mo (95% CI: 1.84 to 3.22 ) [HR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.81; p= 0.0007] and in the AKT pathway altered cohort: 5.45 mo (95% CI: 3.55 to 11.01 ) vs 1.91 mo (95% CI: 1.77 to 3.48) [HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.72; p= 0.0005]. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AE) ipatasertib vs placebo arms (%):37.1 vs 27.4. Grade 3 or higher non haematological treatment related AE > 1% ipatasertib vs placebo arms: diarrhea (16% vs 0%); fatigue (3% vs 0%); vomiting (2% vs 0), rash (2% vs 0%). Treatment discontinuation due to AEs ipatasertib vs placebo arms: 6.5% vs 0.8%. Conclusions: Ipatasertib plus fulvestrant significantly prolongs PFS compared to placebo/fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor–positive MBC post progression on 1 st line CDK 4/6 inhibitor and AI. Follow-up and additional analyses continue. Supported by Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, CCS grant #707213. Clinical trial information: NCT04650581 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Stephen K. L. Chia
Division of Medical Oncology, Vancouver Cancer Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Andrew David Redfern
UWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
Jean-Pierre M. Ayoub
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
Haji I. Chalchal
Allan Blair Cancer Centre, Regina, SK, Canada
Daniel Rayson
Moira Rushton
The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Christine Desbiens
CHA-Hopital Du St-Sacrement, Quebec City, QC, Canada
Dhanusha Sabanathan
Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Jacques Raphael
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
Angela Chan
BCCA - Fraser Valley Cancer Centre, Surrey, BC, Canada
Jessica Singh
Royal Victoria Hospital, Bradford, ON, Canada
Christine E. Simmons
British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Nicholas Zdenkowski
University of Newcastle, Gateshead, NSW, Australia
Sheridan Wilson
Auckland Regional Cancer and Blood Service, Auckland, New Zealand
Danielle Rodin
3Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Division of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada
David W. Cescon
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
Frauke Schimmoller
Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA
Lisa Gallinaro
Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada
Bingshu E. Chen
Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada
Wendy R. Parulekar
Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada