A double-blind placebo controlled randomized phase III trial of fulvestrant and ipatasertib as treatment for advanced HER2-negative and estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer following progression on first line CDK 4/6 inhibitor and aromatase inhibitor: The CCTG/BCT MA.40/FINER study (NCT04650581).

S Stephen K. L. Chia (Division of Medical Oncology, Vancouver Cancer Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada) A Andrew David Redfern (UWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia) J Jean-Pierre M. Ayoub (Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada) H Haji I. Chalchal (Allan Blair Cancer Centre, Regina, SK, Canada) D Daniel Rayson M Moira Rushton (The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada) C Christine Desbiens (CHA-Hopital Du St-Sacrement, Quebec City, QC, Canada) D Dhanusha Sabanathan (Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia) J Jacques Raphael (Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada) A Angela Chan (BCCA - Fraser Valley Cancer Centre, Surrey, BC, Canada) J Jessica Singh (Royal Victoria Hospital, Bradford, ON, Canada) C Christine E. Simmons (British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada) N Nicholas Zdenkowski (University of Newcastle, Gateshead, NSW, Australia) S Sheridan Wilson (Auckland Regional Cancer and Blood Service, Auckland, New Zealand) D Danielle Rodin (3Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Division of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada) D David W. Cescon (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto) F Frauke Schimmoller (Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA) L Lisa Gallinaro (Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada) B Bingshu E. Chen (Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada) W Wendy R. Parulekar (Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada)

Abstract

LBA1005 Background: Standard first line therapy in ER+/ HER2 negative endocrine sensitive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus AI. Upon progression the majority of patients will receive further endocrine based therapy. Alterations in PI3K/AKT pathway genes are a known mechanism of endocrine resistance – either de novo or acquired. The MA.40 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of the AKT inhibitor ipatasertib versus placebo plus fulvestrant in the metastatic breast cancer (MBC) setting immediately post progression on 1 st line CDK4/6 inhibitor and AI. Methods: This phase III, randomized, double-blind trial enrolled pre/peri/postmenopausal women and men with ER+/HER-2 negative MBC. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ipatasertib plus fulvestrant versus (vs) placebo plus fulvestrant. Stratification factors included: AKT pathway altered ( PIK3CA , AKT1 , and/or PTEN genomic alteration(s)) vs wild-type/unknown and endocrine resistance (primary vs secondary). Primary objective: To compare investigator assessed PFS (RECIST 1.1) between treatment arms in the ITT population. Pre-specified secondary analysis: PFS in the AKT pathway altered cohort using a hierarchical procedure. The FoundationOne Liquid cfDNA NGS assay was utilized to assess genomic alterations in the AKT pathway for stratification. Results: 250 participants (females 247/males 3) were enrolled from Canada, Australia and New Zealand between January 2021 and May 2024. Baseline characteristics between arms were balanced. 44.4% of the study population had AKT pathway alteration(s) per cfDNA assay. Median follow-up 15.2 months(mo); proportion remaining on protocol treatment at time of analysis 21.0% ipatasertib vs 11.3% placebo arm. Median PFS ITT ipatasertib vs placebo arms were: 5.32 mo (95% CI: 3.58 to 5.62 mo) vs 1.94 mo (95% CI: 1.84 to 3.22 ) [HR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.81; p= 0.0007] and in the AKT pathway altered cohort: 5.45 mo (95% CI: 3.55 to 11.01 ) vs 1.91 mo (95% CI: 1.77 to 3.48) [HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.72; p= 0.0005]. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AE) ipatasertib vs placebo arms (%):37.1 vs 27.4. Grade 3 or higher non haematological treatment related AE > 1% ipatasertib vs placebo arms: diarrhea (16% vs 0%); fatigue (3% vs 0%); vomiting (2% vs 0), rash (2% vs 0%). Treatment discontinuation due to AEs ipatasertib vs placebo arms: 6.5% vs 0.8%. Conclusions: Ipatasertib plus fulvestrant significantly prolongs PFS compared to placebo/fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor–positive MBC post progression on 1 st line CDK 4/6 inhibitor and AI. Follow-up and additional analyses continue. Supported by Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, CCS grant #707213. Clinical trial information: NCT04650581 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 17_suppl
Published June 10, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

S

Stephen K. L. Chia

Division of Medical Oncology, Vancouver Cancer Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada

A

Andrew David Redfern

UWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

J

Jean-Pierre M. Ayoub

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada

H

Haji I. Chalchal

Allan Blair Cancer Centre, Regina, SK, Canada

D

Daniel Rayson

M

Moira Rushton

The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada

C

Christine Desbiens

CHA-Hopital Du St-Sacrement, Quebec City, QC, Canada

D

Dhanusha Sabanathan

Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

J

Jacques Raphael

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada

A

Angela Chan

BCCA - Fraser Valley Cancer Centre, Surrey, BC, Canada

J

Jessica Singh

Royal Victoria Hospital, Bradford, ON, Canada

C

Christine E. Simmons

British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada

N

Nicholas Zdenkowski

University of Newcastle, Gateshead, NSW, Australia

S

Sheridan Wilson

Auckland Regional Cancer and Blood Service, Auckland, New Zealand

D

Danielle Rodin

3Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Division of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada

D

David W. Cescon

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto

F

Frauke Schimmoller

Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA

L

Lisa Gallinaro

Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada

B

Bingshu E. Chen

Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada

W

Wendy R. Parulekar

Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada