A digital educational and decision-support intervention for patients with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy: Results of a multi-phase, mixed-methods study.
Abstract
12094 Background: Immunotherapy has transformed the treatment of advanced lung cancer, but it has also increased the complexity of information that patients must navigate. Knowledge deficits may compromise disease-management, shared decision-making, and goal-concordant care including timely integration of palliative care. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a digital application to support patients throughout this process. Methods: We employed a multiphase, mixed-methods design comprising: (1) a questionnaire-based online-survey with descriptive analysis (n = 186; SPSS); (2) semi-structured interviews with patients with advanced lung cancer analyzed using qualitative content analysis (n = 20; MAXQDA); (3) user-centered app development involving patients and health-care professionals; and (4) a pre-post pilot study (n = 69) analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Primary outcomes for the pilot study were decisional conflict and knowledge; secondary outcomes included preparedness for decision-making, self-efficacy, usability, and acceptability. Results: Pre-development data integration revealed limited and frequently inaccurate patient knowledge regarding immunotherapy and treatment goals, as well as a discrepancy between patients' desired and actual involvement in treatment decisions, with minimal participation in physician-patient decision-making. The developed app demonstrated high usability and acceptability. In the pilot study, use of the app was associated with a statistically significant reduction in decisional conflict (median [IQR]: 20.3 [6.6–34.0] pre vs. 10.9 [3.1–29.7] post; p = 0.001), significant improvements in knowledge ( p < 0.001), and increased preparedness for decision-making. Conclusions: Insufficient patient participation in decision-making, combined with knowledge deficits about immunotherapy, underscores the need for enhanced communication strategies. The digital application developed in this study appears to be a feasible, acceptable, and effective tool to support informed decision-making among patients with advanced lung cancer. Future research should evaluate integration into routine clinical workflows, long-term impact, and adaptations to address diverse patient needs and evolving treatment options. Clinical trial information: 00032683.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (6)
Matthias Villalobos
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University Hospital and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
Phoebe Ullrich
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University Hospital and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
Henrike Voss
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University Hospital and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
Marie Therese Leimbach
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University Hospital and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
Laura Unsoeld
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University Hospital and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
Michael Thomas