A comparative analysis of epigenetic age acceleration across distinct hematopoietic clones in hematologic diseases

A Atsushi Marumo (1Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States) A Arda Durmaz (Department of Genomic Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Research) A Aashray Mandala (1Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States) C Christopher Haddad (1Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States) F Felipe Sartori (1Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States) O Olivia Hunyadi (1Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States) E Ersan Unlu (1Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States) S Serhan Unlu (2Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States) Z Zachary Brady (1Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States) M Matteo D Addona (1Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States) K Kartik Lakhotiya (1Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States) L Luca Guarnera M Mark Orland (1Translational Hematology & Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) C Carlos Bravo-Perez (1Translational Hematology & Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) C Carmelo Gurnari (1Translational Hematology & Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) V Valeria Visconte (1Translational Hematology & Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) J Jaroslaw Maciejewski (1Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States)

Abstract

Abstract Studiesbased on the Horvath methylation clock have demonstrated that biological age, estimated based on methylation levels at specific CpG sites strongly correlates with chronological age in healthy individuals1). The discrepancy between biological and chronological age is referred to as epigenetic age acceleration differential (AAD). Other analysis showed that AAD is indeed associated with shorter overall survival and certain exposures known to increase AAD2). Biological age, if measured in a polyclonal background, may indicate time-independent predisposition for the acquisition of clonal mutations. However, clonal vs polyclonal cells may theoretically show either concordant or discordant AAD, and this may also be gene type dependent. Given the heterogeneity of clonal burden, bulk analyses may reflect either AAD of leukemic vs normal cells, and consequently, in fully clonal disorders, AAD measured would be that of the leukemic clone rather than the host. We here investigate how AAD might differ between clones within the same individual or how it diverges from biological age in leukemia. To address this, in addition to conventional methylation arrays, we used nanopore sequencing to evaluate AAD. While our analysis of sorted samples is still ongoing, preliminary results are presented here. In patients with myeloid neoplasms (MN), separation of non-clonal vs clonal cells is not possible, and thus bulk DNA results reflect aging of the malignant clone, in particular if clonal burden is high. This limitation of our assay notwithstanding, we analyzed AAD (Horvath Clock minus chronological age in this study) in MN (n=253), aplastic anemia (AA; n=10), and healthy controls (n=322). The breakdown of MN included 191 cases of AML, 26 of MDS/CHIP, 31 of MDS/MPN, 5 of MPN. The median age was 54 years (range: 34–70) in the healthy individuals and 63 years (range: 7–85) in the MN cohort. First, we assessed the correlation between chronological and biological age. In healthy individuals using Horvath Clock (based on 353 CpG sites), the expected correlation between biological and chronologic age was reestablished (n = 322; Horvath clock: P<0.001, Pearson r = 0.81, R2=0.65). The average age acceleration was –1.22 (95% CI: –1.7-0.7). In general, among patients with hematologic diseases, the correlation between the Horvath clock and chronological age was weaker (n = 191; P<0.001, Pearson r = 0.19, R2=0.04). Next, we evaluated the AAD. In healthy individuals, AAD was low (mean: -1.22), and this parameter decreased with age, as shown by the comparison between those >50 and ≤50 years old (P<0.001). Similarly, in both MN and AA, AAD tended to decrease with increasing age. Patients with MN and AA show a higher degree of AAD compared to controls with a higher variance in patients [8.9(-55.8-125.2) in MN, 36.4 (-4.9-71.4) in AA, -1.2(-13.5-16.1) in controls; P<0.001], likely related to their somatic molecular diversity. To further investigate the factors contributing to AAD, we classified samples into a high AAD (AAD≥10 years) and a low AAD (AAD<10 years) and conducted a comparative analysis. In MN, patients with high AAD were significantly younger (P=0.001). Preliminary data indicate that high AAD may depend on somatic genetic features. For instance, IDH1 mutant cases appear to have low AAD but higher numbers of patients have to be collected for comparative analyses. In contrast, we did not find any correlation with the blast count. When we studied AA as a non-malignant disease, the presence of a PNH clone was associated with a trend toward higher AAD (P=0.057). When comparing the relationship between PNH clone size and AAD, no significant correlation was observed, and even patients with small PNH clones exhibited a high AAD. Furthermore, bone marrow transplantation was significantly associated with increased AAD in all patients (P=0.042). Regardless of clone size, AAD was observed across hematologic diseases. In AA, the presence of PNH clones appeared to be associated with increased AAD. As PNH clones are capable of immune evasion and persist under chronic cellular stress, these features may contribute to AAD. For the ASH meeting, we plan to include additional data comparing biological age across fractionated cell populations, as well as differences between nanopore sequencing and conventional methylation arrays. 1 2

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 4945-4945
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (17)

A

Atsushi Marumo

1Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States

A

Arda Durmaz

Department of Genomic Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Research

A

Aashray Mandala

1Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States

C

Christopher Haddad

1Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States

F

Felipe Sartori

1Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States

O

Olivia Hunyadi

1Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States

E

Ersan Unlu

1Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States

S

Serhan Unlu

2Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States

Z

Zachary Brady

1Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States

M

Matteo D Addona

1Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States

K

Kartik Lakhotiya

1Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States

L

Luca Guarnera

M

Mark Orland

1Translational Hematology & Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

C

Carlos Bravo-Perez

1Translational Hematology & Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

C

Carmelo Gurnari

1Translational Hematology & Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

V

Valeria Visconte

1Translational Hematology & Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

J

Jaroslaw Maciejewski

1Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States