A-319, a CD3xCD19 T cell engager, monotherapy for patients with refractory/relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r B-ALL)

J Jin Wang Y Yong Guo (Nanoyang Group, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Carbon and Electrochemical Energy Storage, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, National Industry-Education Integration Platform of Energy Storage, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin)) Q Qike Zhang Y Youfan Feng (3Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China) J Junyuan Qi (4Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Tianjin, China) X Xuejun Zhang L Li Wang (The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital Zhengzhou China) R Rui Huang (School of Chemistry) R Runhui Zheng X Xing Zhao (John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences) X Xuanfan Zhong (9ITabMed Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) S Shengjie Xue (9ITabMed Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) W Wuzhong Shen (9ITabMed Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) Y Ying Tan (Department of Medicinal Chemistry) G Guojian Yu (9ITabMed Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) G Guiyun Tu (9ITabMed Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) H Hanyang Chen (9ITabMed Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) J Jason Xu C Cheng Huang X Xiao Qiang Yan (9ITabMed Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) J Jian-Qing Mi (Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Centre for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Research Unit of Hematologic Malignancies Genomics and Translational Research of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine) T Ting Liu

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Blinatumomab has been approved to treat patients with B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) with 28-day continuous IV infusion. However, the response rate to blinatumomab is unsatisfactory in patients with high tumor burden (NEJM 2017;376:836-847). The continuous dosing schedule is not only inconvenient to patients, but also it can lead to T cell exhaustion as shown by Philipp N. et al. (Blood 2022; 140:1104-1118). Therefore, “Bispecifics need a mindful pause” is proposed to overcome T cell exhaustion during treatment. A-319 is a humanized CD19 x CD3 bispecific T cell engager (TCE) without Fc fragment. A-319 has the same mechanism of action as blinatumomab but with different pharmacological properties. We investigated if A-319 has the potential to treat r/r B-ALL patients with a dose schedule of “3-day dosing and 4-day pause”, especially for patients with high tumor burden. We report the safety and tolerability, the pharmacokinetics, biomarkers, anti-drug antibodies and efficacy of A-319 in r/r B-ALL patients in the phase I study. Methods Forty (Chinese) r/r B-ALL patients (19 male, 21 female), median age 43 yrs (18-65 yrs), were enrolled. Median baseline bone marrow blast was 69% (5-98%), with 83%, 15% and 3% patients being Ph-, Ph+ and Ph-like phenotype, respectively. Patients were enrolled into 6 sequential cohorts with 1 (or 3) + N design. In week (W) 1 (priming), all patients received A-319 at 0.1μg/kg, on days 1, 3 and 5 by 24 hours IV infusion. In W2-W4 (treatment), patients in cohort 1-4 received A-319 at 0.1, or 0.2, or 0.4, or 0.6μg/kg, on days 1, 3 and 5 by 6 hours IV infusion. Patients in cohort 5 (0.8μg/kg) and 6 (2.4μg/kg) were dosed by 24 hours IV infusion, respectively. One treatment cycle consists of 1-W priming and 3-W treatment plus 2-W break. Patients received 2-cycle of treatment. Responders may continue for additional 2 cycles. The study was approved by the local hospital IRBs and registered as CTR20210368 (www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn). Results Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached for the study. One DLT occurred at cohort 5 (0.8 µg/kg) by 6 hours IV dosing. The most common (overall incidence ≥ 20%) TEAEs (Treatment Emergent Adverse Event) of grade 3 or higher were lymphopenia (60.5%), white blood cell counts decreased (52.6%), neutropenia (47.4%), thrombocytopenia (44.7%), anemia (28.9%) and pneumonia (28.9%). Grade 3 infections occurred in 15 patients (39.5%). Two infection-related deaths were reported, one in cohort 2 (last dosing on day 19, cycle 2) and the other in cohort 6 (last dosing on day 19, cycle 1). One disease progression-related death occurred in the Ph+ patient (day 20 after 2-cycle treatment). Grade 2 and 3 CRS (cytokine release syndrome) occurred in 24 (63.2%) and 2 (5.3%) patients, respectively. CRS mainly occurred following the first escalating dose. Grade 2 and 3 neurotoxicity or ICANs (immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome) occurred in 2 (5.3%) and 2 (5.3%) patients, respectively. One patient in cohort 2 reported grade 4 tumor lysis syndrome. No grade 3 CRS, and 1 grade 3 neurotoxicity were reported in cohort 6. No patient developed anti-A-319 antibodies during the study. Overall, a total of 32 patients had completed at least one cycle treatment. No CR was observed from cohort 1-3. One CR reported each in cohort 4 and 5, In cohort 6 (n=19), 11/19 (57.9%) patients achieved CR, and 3/19 (15.8%) patients achieved CRi, and 13/14 (92.9%) responders achieved MRD-after one-cycle treatment. After 2-cycle treatment, 11/12 (91.7%) patients achieved CR and 10/11 (90.9%) patients achieved MRD-, respectively. In patients with high tumor burden (BM blast > 50%) in cohort 6, 9/13 (69%) patients achieved CR+CRi, while patients with lower tumor burden (BM blast < 50%) achieved 83% (5/6) CR+CRi after one cycle treatment. Conclusions When administered at 3-day (D1, D3, D5) dosing with 4-day (D2, D4, D6-D7) pause schedule, A-319 (1.2μg/kg/day) demonstrated a tolerable safety profile with a high CR and MRD- rate in r/r B-ALL patients, especially for those patients with high tumor burden. Therefore, further clinical study is warranted.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 6853-6853
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (22)

J

Jin Wang

Y

Yong Guo

Nanoyang Group, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Carbon and Electrochemical Energy Storage, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, National Industry-Education Integration Platform of Energy Storage, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin)

Q

Qike Zhang

Y

Youfan Feng

3Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China

J

Junyuan Qi

4Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Tianjin, China

X

Xuejun Zhang

L

Li Wang

The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital Zhengzhou China

R

Rui Huang

School of Chemistry

R

Runhui Zheng

X

Xing Zhao

John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences

X

Xuanfan Zhong

9ITabMed Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China

S

Shengjie Xue

9ITabMed Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China

W

Wuzhong Shen

9ITabMed Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China

Y

Ying Tan

Department of Medicinal Chemistry

G

Guojian Yu

9ITabMed Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China

G

Guiyun Tu

9ITabMed Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China

H

Hanyang Chen

9ITabMed Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China

J

Jason Xu

C

Cheng Huang

X

Xiao Qiang Yan

9ITabMed Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China

J

Jian-Qing Mi

Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Centre for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Research Unit of Hematologic Malignancies Genomics and Translational Research of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

T

Ting Liu