A 3-year landmark overall survival analysis of RP1 plus nivolumab in patients with anti–PD-1–failed melanoma from the IGNYTE clinical trial.
Abstract
9518 Background: Advanced melanoma has a high mortality rate; however, survival for patients (pts) treated with anti–PD-1–based therapy tends to plateau at 3–4 years, suggesting that pts alive at 3 years are likely to have prolonged benefit. This highlights the need for novel therapies that offer increased survival beyond 3-4 years. RP1 (vusolimogene oderparepvec) is an HSV-1–based oncolytic immunotherapy expressing GM-CSF and a fusogenic glycoprotein (GALV-GP-R − ). In the IGNYTE trial (data cutoff [DCO]: 15OCT2024), pts with advanced melanoma that had confirmed progression on anti–PD-1 therapy who received RP1 + nivolumab (nivo) had an objective response rate by RECIST 1.1 of 33.6% (16.4% complete response); median duration of response was 24.8 months. Here, we present a 3-year survival analysis of pts treated with RP1 + nivo from IGNYTE (last pt in: 9MAR2023; DCO: 11JUN2025). Methods: Pts ≥18 years with advanced melanoma and confirmed progression while being treated for ≥8 weeks with anti–PD-1 ± anti–CTLA-4 as the last prior therapy were enrolled (NCT03767348). An initial dose of RP1 was administered intratumorally (1 × 10 6 PFU/mL), followed by up to 7 doses every 2 weeks (Q2W; 1 × 10 7 PFU/mL) in combination with intravenous nivo 240 mg Q2W/480 mg Q4W for up to 2 years; additional RP1 was allowed if protocol-specified criteria were met. This updated analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. Results: Of 140 enrolled pts, 49.3% had stage IVM1b–d disease, 55.7% had PD-L1–negative tumors, 46.4% had prior anti–PD-1 + anti–CTLA-4 therapy, and 65.0% had primary resistance to prior anti–PD-1 (ie, progression within 6 months of starting the immediate prior course of anti–PD-1). The median (95% CI) OS was 32.2 (25.8, 39.2) months (the median OS follow-up was 3 years by reverse KM method). OS rates (95% CI) at 1, 2, and 3 years were 75.3% (66.9%, 81.9%), 61.6% (52.5%, 69.4%), and 45.5% (35.8%, 54.7%), respectively. Importantly, among responders (n=47), the 3-year OS rate (95% CI) was 81.8% (65.2%, 91.0%) vs 22.5% (12.6%, 34.2%) for non-responders (n=93). The 3-year OS rates were 41.8% in pts with stage IVM1b–d disease (n=69), 37.2% for those with PD-L1–negative tumors (n=78), 37.4% in pts with prior anti–PD-1 + anti–CTLA-4 therapy (n=65), and 44.8% in pts with primary resistance to anti–PD-1 (n=91). The safety profile for RP1 + nivo remained consistent with prior reports; no new safety signals were seen. Conclusions: The 3-year landmark OS rate of 45.5% in the overall population and 81.8% among responders provides further evidence that the deep and durable responses provided by RP1 + nivo translate into long term clinical benefit, including extended OS in pts with melanoma post-confirmed progression on prior anti–PD-1–based therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03767348 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Michael K.K. Wong
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
Joseph J. Sacco
Gino Kim In
Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Eva Muñoz Couselo
Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Vall d’Hebron Hospital Medical Oncology Department, Barcelona, Spain
Dirk Schadendorf
Jiaxin Niu
Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ
Georgia Beasley
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
Trisha Michel Wise-Draper
University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH
Bartosz Chmielowski
Judith Michels
Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
Mohammed M. Milhem
Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
Tawnya Lynn Bowles
Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT
Katy K. Tsai
Céleste Lebbé
Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste
From the Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center (J.D.W.) and the Department of Medicine (J.D.W., M.A.P.), Weill Cornell Medicine, and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (M.A.P.) — both in New York; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua (V.C.-S.), European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (P.Q.), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRCCS, Meldola (M.G.), University of Siena and the Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena (M.M.), and Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples (P.A.A.) — all in Italy; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland (P.R.); Texas Oncology–Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas (C.L.C.); University Hospital Essen, the German Cancer Consortium, the National Center for Tumor Diseases–West, the Research Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, and University Duisburg-Essen — all in Essen, Germany (D.S.); the College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea (J.W.), Brist...
Adel Samson
Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
George Kong
Replimune, Inc., Woburn, MA
Praveen Bommareddy
Replimune, Inc., Woburn, MA
Jeannie Whit-Shan Hou
Replimune, Inc., Woburn, MA
Caroline Robert