7-day venetoclax combined with intensive chemotherapy as induction treatment in high-risk newly diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Abstract
Abstract INTRODUCTION Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the high-risk group accounts for about 40-50% of adult acute myeloid leukemia, with a low response rate and poor long-term survival to conventional chemotherapy. In recent years, Venetoclax (VEN) combined with intensive chemotherapy(IC) has significantly improved the complete remission (CR) rate and MRD(-) rate in newly diagnosed AML patients, but the efficacy in patients with high-risk prognosis is still unclear, in order to further explore the efficacy of VEN combined with IC for high-risk AML patients.Herein, we reported the data of 80 patients with newly diagnosed high-risk AML who received 7-day VEN combined with IC (DA, HAA, or HAD) as induction treatment. To further validate the efficacy and safety of VEN combined with IC for AML in high-risk groups. METHODS The patients included in this study were derived from two clinical trials (VEN+DA: ChiCTR2200061524; VEN+HAA: ChiNCT05893472) and one retrospective study (VEN+HAD). All induction regimens include a 7-day oral administration of VEN, in combination with either DA (DNR 60 mg/m²/day d2-3, and Ara-c 100 mg/m²/q12h d2-7), HAA (HHT at 2.5mg/m2/day d3-7, Ara-c 100 mg/m²/day d3-7, and Acla 20mg/day d3-7), or HAD regimen (HHT at 2mg/m2/day d2-6, DNR 45 mg/m²/day d 4-5, and 100 mg/m²/day d2-6). After achieving CR, allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) were recommended according to ELN guidelines (2022). Patients who could not proceed allo-HSCT received consolidation and maintenance therapy. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of a 7-day VEN-based induction therapy in patients with high-risk AML. The secondary objectives were to evaluate overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). RESULTS Between January 2023 and June 2024, a total of 80 de novo high-risk patients were enrolled and treated with VEN combined with IC as induction therapy. Among them, 38 patients underwent treatment with VEN+DA, 32 patients received VEN+HAA, and 10 patients were treated with VEN+HAD. The cCR(CR+CRi) rate in the entire cohort was 85.0%(CR 67/80,CRi 1/80), and the MRD(-) rate was 80.0% by flow cytometry. Comparing treatment subgroups, the cCR rates were 86.8% (CR 32/38,CRi 1/38) for VEN+DA, 81.3% (CR 26/32,CRi 0/32) for VEN+HAA, and 90.0%(CR 9/10,CRi 0/10) for VEN+HAD (p=0.722) and MRD negtive rates were 78.9% (30/38), 81.3% (26/32), and 80.0% (8/10), respectively (p=0.972). The most frequent adverse effects were neutropenia (100%), thrombocytopenia (100%) and pneumonia (63.8%). The median recovery time for neutrophils and platelets were 14(range:7-52) and 13(range:4-63) days, respectively. Until April,30, 2025, with a median follow-up of 19(1-38) months, 40.0% of patients underwent allo-HSCT (28.9% in VEN+DA, 40.6% in VEN+HAA, and 80.0% in VEN+HAD, p=0.014). The median OS and EFS were not reached. The estimated 24-month OS and EFS were 60.6% (95% CI: 48.4-72.8%) and 57.8% (95% CI: 46.4-69.2%) in the entire cohort, 55.8% (95% CI: 38.2-73.4%) and 55.2% (95% CI: 38.3-72.1%) in the VEN+DA group, 74.3% (95% CI: 58.8-89.8%) and 68.2% (95% CI: 51.9-84.5%) in the VEN+HAA group, and 38.1% (95% CI: 0.9-75.3%) and 35.0% (95% CI: 3.6-66.4%) in the VEN+HAD group, respectively(OS: p=0.37; EFS: p=0.41). Conclusion 7-day VEN combined with intensive chemotherapy is an effective and safe induction therapy for high-risk AML patients. 【Keywords】Venetoclax; Chemotherapy; AML; Induction treatment;High-risk
Article Details
Authors (12)
Xiaohan Zhang
Department of Otolaryngology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Medical Science and Technology Innovation Center, School of Clinical and Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences
Xiaohui SUO
2Department of Hematology, Handan Central Hospital, Handan, Hebei, China, 056000, Handan, China
Guanchen Bai
3Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Tai'an City Central Hospital of Qingdao University, Taian, Shandong, China, 271000, Taian, China
Xingli Zhao
Department of Neurology, Linquan County People’s Hospital, Fuyang, China
Yanliang Bai
Hongling Peng
Fang Zheng
Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Dongmei Wang
Liyun Zhao
ZePing Zhou
1The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Department of Hematology, kunming, China
Yingchang Mi
Kaiqi Liu