3-weekly docetaxel 75 mg/m <sup>2</sup> vs 2-weekly docetaxel 50 mg/m <sup>2</sup> in combination with darolutamide + ADT in patients with mHSPC: Subgroup analyses from the randomised phase 3 ARASAFE trial.
Abstract
153 Background: Triple therapy with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), darolutamide (DARO), and docetaxel (DOCE) is approved for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). DARO triple therapy with DOCE 50 mg/m² Q2W is hypothesized to reduce grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) vs standard 75 mg/m² Q3W. Methods: In this academic, randomized, open-label, multicenter phase 3 trial (NCT05676203), 250 men with mHSPC were randomized 1:1 (JUN 2023 – DEC 2024) to receive ADT, DARO, and 6 cycles of DOCE 75 mg/m 2 Q3W (3-week cycle; D75) or 50 mg/m² Q2W (4-week cycle; D50). Primary objective was to compare grade 3-5 AE rates 26 weeks after last patient first DOCE dose (LPFD) in the safety population, followed by the rate of grade 3/4 neutropenia or death from any cause (NAER) as secondary safety variable. We herein report primary endpoint data of pre-specified subgroups. Results: In the safety population, 128 patients received DOCE in the D75 arm and 121 in the D50 arm. ARASAFE met its primary endpoint (rate of grade 3-5 AEs p=0.0024; NAER p<0.00001, previously published). The benefits in favor of D50 were maintained across all subgroups and independent of extent of disease (low vs high volume), ALP levels (< vs ≥ upper limit of normal [ULN]), age (< vs ≥ median [68 years], see table), ECOG performance status at study entry (0 vs 1, see table), baseline PSA (< vs ≥ median), Gleason score at study entry (<8 vs ≥8), and presence of metastases at primary diagnosis ( de novo vs metachronous metastatic disease). The PSA response rate (PSA≤0.2 ng/ml, 26 weeks after LFPD) was higher in D75 (48.8% vs. 41.3%), the 1 year post-LPFD rate will be available at the time of presentation. Conclusions: The benefits of the D50 approach in reducing grade 3-5 AE rate and NAER (primary endpoints) were independent of patients' age and performance status, as well as of surrogate markers of tumor load. The ARASAFE approach (D50) may therefore represent a potential new standard of care for triple therapy across all mHPSC subgroups. Further follow-up is ongoing to determine its efficacy in terms of oncological outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT05676203 (and EU CT number: 2022-502634-52-00) . Primary endpoint parameters per age and ECOG subgroups. Outcome parameter Characteristic Subgroup D75: N D75: Rate (95% CI), % D50: N D50: Rate (95% CI), % High grade (3-5) adverse events Age <68 yrs* 60 76.7 (64.0, 86.6) 61 55.7 (42.4, 68.5) ≥68 yrs* 68 80.9 (69.5, 89.4) 60 66.7 (53.3, 78.3) ECOG 0 100 77.0 (67.5, 84.8) 105 58.1 (48.1, 67.7) 1 28 85.7 (67.3, 96.0) 16 81.2 (54.4, 96.0) High grade (3-4) neutropenia or death Age <68 yrs* 60 60.0 (46.5, 72.4) 61 18.0 (9.4, 30.0) ≥68 yrs* 68 67.6 (55.2, 78.5) 60 30.0 (18.8, 43.2) ECOG 0 100 65.0 (54.8, 74.3) 105 22.9 (15.2, 32.1) 1 28 60.7 (40.6, 78.5) 16 31.2 (11.0, 58.7) *Cut-off = median age.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Marc-Oliver Grimm
Gunhild von Amsberg
Hendrik Heers
Department of Urology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
Stephan Degener
Department of Urology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
Florian Roghmann
Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Marienhospital Herne, Herne, Germany
Jozefina Casuscelli
Steffen Rausch
Marinela Augustin
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nuremberg Hospital, Campus Nord, Nuremberg, Germany
Lothar Haeberle
bioMed Statistics GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
Katharina Leucht
Department of Urology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Comprehensive Cancer Center Germany, Jena, Germany
Andrea Roessler
Department of Urology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Comprehensive Cancer Center Germany, Jena, Germany
Friedemann Zengerling